[Nagios-users] Updated RPM for Nagios 1.0

Karl DeBisschop karl at debisschop.net
Sat May 31 01:54:35 CEST 2003


On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:08, Ethan Galstad wrote:
> On 30 May 2003 at 7:20, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> 
> > I have updated the RPM for nagios 1.0 to fix install problems under
> > Red Hat 9 and to incorporate some patches submitted on the
> > nagios-devel list.
> > 
> > The SRPM should work for Red Hat 7.x, 8.0, and 9, and can be found at:
> > 
> > 
> >  http://karl.debisschop.net/src/nagios-1.0-4.src.rpm
> > 
> > RPMs for Red Hat 9 are at
> > 
> >  http://karl.debisschop.net/src/redhat/9/nagios-*1.0-4.i386.rpm
> > 
> > The patches applied related to:
> > 
> >  - PostgreSQL 7.3 timestamps (but these are in xdata ahich are not
> >    currently built by the RPM)
> >  - File descriptor leak (xpdfile.c)
> >  - Small doco fix (xodtemplate.html)
> >  - Bug in cgi/cmd.c (initialize time if CGI form is empty)
> >  - Bug in cgi/history.c (missing semicolons)
> > 
> > Turns out to be harder than one would expect to gather the patches.
> > There is no stable brach in the CVS, and people generally neglct to
> > mention if a patch applies to 1.0 or to CVS.
> > 
> > But I look through the archives for all the patches I could find that
> > were clearly for 1.0 and were 'blessed' by Ethan. Let me know of other
> > important patches I missed.

> I was just about to release 1.1 on my day off, so this is good 
> timing.  I forgot to apply the cmd CGI patch to the 1.x branch, but 
> will do so ASAP.  FYI, the stable branch of CVS for 1.x is called 
> nagios-1-x-bugfixes.  

My (demonstrably flawed) recollection was that you hadn't made a fork --
I should have checked first).

> I believe the Postgres timestamp patch (submitted by jbearce on Nov. 
> 6th) was already applied to 1.0, although there might have been a 
> later patch that I missed.  Other than that, you got all the patches 
> since 1.0 (there weren't many). 

I notices two patches - one for 7.2, which was applied, another for 7.3
which was (I believe) after the release. I did not check CVS (because I
was unaware of the stable branch). I can look tonight.

I have some changes to the spec file for this RPM which should go into
the 1.1 release. I will try very hard to get them in both branches of
CVS tonight, and drop you a note when I do.

--
Karl




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5




More information about the Developers mailing list