clean_macro_chars() no longer called in utils.c in 2.0b1 ?

[Jason Martin]

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:29:06AM +0100, Sascha Runschke wrote:
> I'm still wondering if cleaning of unwanted chars is really the thing
> to do. In my opinion it would be "more correct" to escape those
> characters properly instead of just erasing them.
The output may pass through an unknown number  of scripts, and
not all of those scripts can easily re-escape the values (such
as sh). Removing them out seems safest.

-Jason Martin

-- 
"Is" is the verb for when you don't want a verb.
This message is PGP/MIME signed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/developers/attachments/20050210/85213183/attachment.sig>