Nagios 3 scheduling test performance suggestions

Ethan Galstad nagios at nagios.org
Thu Mar 8 02:54:33 CET 2007


Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> I think there is something missing in the PERFORMANCE SUGGESTIONS section of
> the scheduling test (-s).
> 
> I used to update the status file as results comes in
> (aggregate_status_updates=0). While building a big Nagios box I came to the
> point where the service reaper thread was unable to reap fast enough to keep
> latency low. Changing it to 5 seconds updates made an incredible difference
> and now nagios hardly uses more than 10% CPU (I'd say 3-5 average). Startup
> time was also drastically reduced.
> 
> While this box runs against Nagios 2.7 it's one of the configs I updated and
> used for testing Nagios 3.0 and it never complained about status updates
> aggregation.
> 
> Right now that box runs 869 active checks per minutes with very light load
> :)
> 
> Thomas
> 

Nagios 3 requires that all status file updates are aggregated, at a 
minimum 1 second interval.  I'll update the docs to indicate this and 
have Nagios log a warning if it sees the old aggregate_status_updates 
variable in the config file.


Ethan Galstad,
Nagios Developer
---
Email: nagios at nagios.org
Website: http://www.nagios.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV




More information about the Developers mailing list