Extremely bad performance when enabling process_performance_data on Solaris 10?

[Hendrik Bäcker]

Andreas Ericsson schrieb:
> 
> I haven't run into it, but I would solve it with a NEB-module that sends
> the performance data to a graphing server. It's really quite trivial to
> do, and a send(2) call generally finishes quickly enough.
> 

Might be wrong, but a long time ago I've investigated some time to write
an NEB Mod that should call send_nsca to get rid of the blocking ocsp
command.
I've found out that even a neb module is blocking too.

Just want to say that you should take care of the time your neb module
is doing something.

But as Andreas said: a send() should be faster than an popen() that I
did in the past.

Just my 2 Cents.

Hendrik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2185 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/developers/attachments/20070927/7dbee049/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-devel mailing list
Nagios-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-devel