Difference in CPU time with and without ePN

[Thomas Guyot-Sionnest]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/01/08 03:35 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> Thomas Guyot-Sionnest wrote:
>>
>> This graph clearly shows that ePN is a must for any big system that rely
>> heavily on Perl plugins. The difference you see here is caused by only
>> 28 check out of nearly 1000.
>>
> 
> Have you found a way around the memory leakage? Otherwise, I still believe
> it's  more hassle than it's worth, and effort would be better spent to cut
> the number of fork()'s in half by having Nagios multiplex its checks.

I never noticed any memory problem with the ePN and my Nagios often ran
for many consecutive months without being stopped (doing SIGHUPs from
time to time to update the config trough)

Could you direct me to some documents of communication archives that
point out the problem?

Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHhMKf6dZ+Kt5BchYRAgA9AJ9WR4dL2C5yeE4PSwBAe804btMMgACeM72V
QplmZPq6I8/yJUEmLD/e4FI=
=Vo8x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace