Help with checks_enabled
Tom DE BLENDE
tdeblend at gcc.dhl.com
Wed Feb 19 13:57:29 CET 2003
You need at least one service per host.
"Hays, Sam" wrote:
>
> I have an entry in hosts.cfg that looks like this:
>
> define host{
> use generic-host
> host_name AcctLsrJet5k
> alias Accounting's LaserJet 5000
> address 10.0.10.3
> check_command check-host-alive
> checks_enabled 1
> max_check_attempts 5
> notification_interval 120
> notification_period workhours
> }
>
> However - and maybe I'm unclear on the matter - I'm not getting host checks
> with this thing - it simply always reads as "Pending". If I need to add a
> PING entry into services.cfg I have no (ok, only a slight) problem with
> that.... It seems though that with check_enabled it should ping the host
> periodically and allow me to keep services more 'clean'.
>
> Sam
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
> The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
> Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
> www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list