FreeBSD & Nagios with statusmap.cgi | How??

[Elliot Finley]

I had it up and running on FreeBSD-5.0 in about an hour....
portupgrade/portinstall is your friend.

Elliot

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bas van der Veen" <bas.vanderveen at kahuna.nl>
To: "Karl DeBisschop" <karl at debisschop.net>
Cc: <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] FreeBSD & Nagios with statusmap.cgi | How??


Karl,

I didn't mean to imply that the developers of Nagios should make the *total*
faq for running Nagios on FreeBSD.

Just a little note stating that FreeBSD users can use the ported version
(without any warranty about it functioning or not) would have been nice. I
had Nagios up and running in 3 hours on a linux box (fully working that is).
FreeBSD takes 2 days now and it ain't finished yet :-( (FreeBSD = company
policy).

Regards,

Bas

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl DeBisschop [mailto:karl at debisschop.net]
Sent: donderdag 27 februari 2003 13:08
To: Bas van der Veen
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] FreeBSD & Nagios with statusmap.cgi | How??


On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 05:52, Bas van der Veen wrote:
> Ok, looks like nagios is a ported application for FreeBSD.
>
> I am now checking whether this install works :-)
>
> Would have been nice if I could have found this in the FAQ's or the FM
though...

I'm not sure I agree. We have nothing to do with the port. It can come
or go, the version in ports can change, the maintainer could forsake the
material world and run off the a convent at the north pole and we'd know
nothing about it. So why shoould we be responsible for making that FAQ.
Shouldn't the ports maintainer make that information readily available,
rather than us?

(Not trying to be sarcastic -- nor do I rule the idea out. But it does
seem like our standing in FreeBSD ports is simply not best placed in our
FAQ, or if there is a placement, it should be quite general.)

Or the port maintainer should be more communicative about it to us so we
can know the above things. (Maybe s/he has been and I've missed it, but
I know I seldom hear a peep from most maintainers, Ben Bell when he diid
debian packaging was the big exception).

--
Karl



******************************************************************
This footnote also confirms that this email message has
been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of
computer viruses.
******************************************************************
http://www.kahuna.nl



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =omething 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null