Once a day checks?

[Jason Martens]

I would be interested in the oracle "stuff". Let us know when and where
we can get it.

Jason

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 13:55, Lonny Selinger wrote:
> This should be as simple as adding a new timeperiod and assigning it
> to what youd like to check only once a day. The DBA where I am is
> currently working on a revamp of some current code for monitoring
> Oracle *stuff* (I say stuff because theres quite a bit of it), he
> keeps saying its not ready yet but I'm sure he's going to release it
> soon (at least in alpha), just in case anyone is interested.
> 
> --
> Lonny Selinger
> 
> > Is it possible to do once a day checks? If so, can you provide me an
> > example? I have looked in the documentation but not extensively.
> > Before
> > I did, I wanted to check with this group. Our DBA's want to add some
> > daily checks on stuff like buffer quality,user calls, sorts, rollback
> > waits/gets,etc.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
> Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
> Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
> www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null