Hosts with no services?
Subhendu Ghosh
sghosh at sghosh.org
Thu Jun 26 14:32:51 CEST 2003
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Rob Nelson wrote:
>
> >I think I agree with Jim. I guess I don't see why you would care if a
> >system was up if you didn't care about at least one service - unless
> >that 'service' is keeping the room warm. Why not pull the power cord
> >now? If you're not responsible for making sure the system is up or
> >tracking some metric about specific services then why even configure it
> >in Nagios?
>
> I monitor wireless access points. What I *really* want to know is if
> traffic is being passed by the WAP, and ideally I'd be monitoring a client
> behind it, but that's not possible. For me, a check_ping is sufficient to
> know that traffic is going up and down the line. By pinging all the devices
> in a chain, I can find out where the problem starts (even if everything
> behind a dead host is dead as well, it gives me a place to start).
> Honestly, our biggest problem is power surges that put switches or WAP's in
> an error state that doesn't pass traffic. I'd kill for really cheap and
> small UPS's that would last just 30 seconds :)
>
I tend to use snmp to monitor the traffic and the root-bridge-id on the
APs specially if they are on their on vlan...
Have you looked at the APCC CyberFort ups/surge protector?
-sg
--
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list