Service Dependencies doesn't WORK????
Bill Thompson
Billt at Mahagonny.com
Tue May 13 19:11:15 CEST 2003
On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:54:03 +0200
"Miguel A. Torres" <matorres at prisacom.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You are right...I have the wrong idea about service depenencies. But
> after to re-read the docc I think that I can use the "Service
> Dependencies" feature to simulate that I want. My intention is the
> following:
>
> I have a service A dependent on service B. If the service B turn on the
> critical state the service A will not be checked. Now, with my actual
> configuration when this occur the service A don't turn any diferent
> state.
>
> Then my question is:
>
> if the service A is not checked why dont't turn on other state???(for
> example unreachabe).
>
> I need that a dependent servie A turn on a different (anyone) state when
> the master service B turn on critical state. Is it possible with these
> feature?? and with other feature of nagios??
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Miguel A. Torres
If you set your dependency so that service A is not checked when service B
is down, service A will remain on the monitor in the same state it was
when the checking stopped. Perhaps what you want to do is have the
dependency set to stop notifications on service A when service B is down,
but continue to check the service. This way when service B goes down,
service A will also fail and be set to "unreachable", but you will not
receive an e-mail or paged notification.
--
BillT at Mahagonny.com - PGP KeyID#: 0xFB966670
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list