distributed monitoring and passive host checks?

Marc Powell mpowell at ena.com
Thu Oct 16 19:37:31 CEST 2003



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Fellner [mailto:wmf at noris.de]
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:28 PM
> To: Marc Powell
> Cc: Demetri Mouratis; nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> Marc Powell wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think you've described exactly what he's doing, which does not
include
> > passive host checks, which he's asking for. I've actually done the
same
> > as you (except not even specified a host check command), but by
doing
> > so, we lose all the benefits of the host checks like parenting,
> > unreachability, host dependencies, etc.
> 
> exactly.
> i search a way to do passive _host_ checks.


Well, as was stated before, they're not supported until Nagios 2.0
although using check_by_ssh as the host command (mentioned earlier) is a
very interesting way to get around that limitation. I don't expect that
it would work well with large number of hosts being monitored unless you
had a low failure rate.

--
Marc 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list