[Nagmin-users] NagMIN Question
Fred Reimers
fredreimers at comcast.net
Wed Oct 22 01:10:42 CEST 2003
Martin,
I read the Nagios 2.0 docs and it doesn't appear that all MySQL support
is going to go away in 2.0. The only tables that NagMIN is using are
the hoststatus and servicestatus tables.
I hope they don't get rid of all of it. I love Nagios but my concern
has been, and is, that it's too focused on continuing to modify
different ways of configuring it from flat files. The more this can
remain static, the more applications, like NagMIN can be developed to
provide different ways of auto-generating configurations. Why add
service groups to Nagios, as a flat-file configuration, if an
application like NagMIN can already provide that functionality. In my
view, getting rid of all status information information in a database
would be a mistake since it also facilities other development.
In my view, I don't see any reason to move from 1.1 unless there's some
big change in the polling engine that I would need. I don't see
anything in 2.0 that's a show-stopper.
I'm also happy with the CGIs, except that I would love to be able to
expand/close host groups/hosts/services from the status screens.
Service Detail is not scalable. I'm going to write a script for use, in
place of side.html, that will allow you to search for a host, and to
list host groups by pulling the information from the NagMIN database.
Right now, I'm having problems with the TAC screen in version 1.1. The
columns skew to the right. I'm copying tac.c from 1.0 into 1.1 and
compiling it. I've made some changes to my version of status.c so that
the sounds stop after an alert has been acknowledged.
Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin, Stanley G [CC] [mailto:Stanley.G.Martin at mail.sprint.com]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:31 AM
To: freimers at sanctuarynet.org; skip at pobox.com
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net;
nagmin-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] RE: [Nagmin-users] NagMIN Question
As far as MySQL support in Nagios goes, I've heard rumblings that that
support is going to go away soon.
Stanley G. Martin
System Administrator
Sprint - EAS Business Intelligence
Stanley.G.Martin at mail.sprint.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Reimers [mailto:fredreimers at comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:49 PM
To: skip at pobox.com
Cc: Martin, Stanley G [CC]; nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net;
nagmin-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] RE: [Nagmin-users] NagMIN Question
All bugs and one patch was included in 2.0.1.
I don't think you'll have any problems upgrading from 1.6.0 for basic
functionality. It should be a lot better.
However, the traffic stats, SNMP stuff, etc., should be considered beta.
Part of the reason it's taken a few months to get fixes in is that I've
been working on the traffic stats, and other things that I need. I
haven't had much time to document or consider environments dissimilar to
my development machine.
I'm running into some issues myself as I'm installing the upgrades on
some other machines and have run into some problems with the Web Portal
and the new SNMP Scan with quoting and some other issues but not with
the basic stuff and previous NagMIN enhancements are working better. The
Nagios DB integration is key to using many of the new and planned
enhancements, so I'd strongly recommend using MySQL support with Nagios
if you aren't already.
I will be monitoring SourceForge more closely and coming out with more
releases over the next two months to keep up with peoples requests. I'm
glad that NagMIN appears to be helping some others who were in the same
situation as myself.
If you want to donate to NagMIN please visit http://www.sanctuarynet.org
and consider donating to Sanctuary International to support orphanages
in Romania and Honduras. My boys are in the pictures on the Home Page.
Fred Reimers
Vice President
Sanctuary International
-----Original Message-----
From: nagmin-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagmin-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Skip
Montanaro
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:30 PM
To: freimers at sanctuarynet.org
Cc: 'Martin, Stanley G [CC]'; nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net;
nagmin-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] RE: [Nagmin-users] NagMIN Question
Fred> NagMIN 2.0.2 is up on SourceForge now and is the best version.
Any issues involved in upgrading from 1.6.0? I posted a patch to SF a
few days ago:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=820273&group_id
=77010&atid=548908
Did that make it into 2.0.2? It's useful for people like me who want to
store related info in the NagMIN database which NagMIN won't use.
Another problem I encountered but forgot to file a bug report about is
that NagMIN doesn't properly quote ` (backquote) characters. They can
turn up in command definitions enclosing embedded Unix commands. Does
2.0.2 fix this?
--
Skip Montanaro
Got gigs? http://www.musi-cal.com/
http://www.mojam.com/
Got spam? http://spambayes.sf.net/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people
who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here:
http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Nagmin-users mailing list
Nagmin-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagmin-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100
http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list