parents question again
Matt Pounsett
matt.pounsett at cira.ca
Thu Jan 22 21:04:20 CET 2004
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:58 PM -0500 Matt Pounsett
> <matt.pounsett at cira.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, good point, you don't get the network dependency there. ;) You
> >> still get the correct mapping for the two nagios servers though, which
> >> is really what I want more than anything.
> >
> > Right.. but if you're not getting dependancies, then you've broken the way
> > the parent/child relationship is intended to work.
>
> Well, you still won't get this with how nagios currently works right now,
> anyway, because you draw the parent/child relationships as they go to
> Nagios, not how they are dependant on one another. Using your own example,
> if my one and only nagios server is on switch 2, which is dependant on
> switch 1, switch 2 would still need to be the parent of switch 1 for Nagios
> to function correctly.
Huh?
Yes, you do get proper dependancy relationships right now. If your one and
only nagios server is connected to switch 2, then switch 2 is the parent of
switch 1. Accessing switch 2 from the nagios server is not dependant in any
way on switch 1 being accessible.
--
Matt Pounsett CIRA - Canadian Internet Registration Authority
Technical Support Programmer 350 Sparks Street, Suite 1110
matt.pounsett at cira.ca Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
613.237.5335 ext. 231 http://www.cira.ca
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list