HTTPS access to Nagios web pages

Jason Martin jhmartin at toger.us
Tue Jun 15 20:04:08 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I wasn't aware of any Apache 2.0 problems, there really shouldn't be any 
abnormal interaction between the two.

- -Jason Martin

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Horvath Tamas 
wrote:

> Thank you Jason!
> 
> I bought an Apach book and read that among other things (download
> SSLeay, and Apach-SSL pacth, etc.) I have to recomplie Apache.
> 
> Now I use Apache 1.3.1 with Nagios 1.1. As I can see in the Nagios FAQ
> there is two minor problems with Apache 2.0 but these can be repair
> easily.
> 
> Is it recommended to upgrade our Apache to 2.0.xx? What are the pros and
> cons of Apache 2.0 with Nagios?
> 
> I appreciate your help!
> 
> Tamas!
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.2 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQFAzzodl2ODWuqVSBMRAjoKAKCJ7xO+aPLgXMfY7MQENK7/xI1MqACgnnAr
1jalvZw5ibl0Uvp7gfl+Wy0=
=WB1s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list