Everything works! But I want more!
Robert Nelson
rnelson at windchannel.com
Wed Nov 24 20:03:20 CET 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jeff vier [mailto:boinger at tradingtechnologies.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:53 AM
> To: Ben Hyde
> Cc: nagios-users
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Everything works! But I want more!
>
>
> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:54 -0600, Ben Hyde wrote:
> > > The check_ok command is simply a call to 'check_dummy OK'. You
> > can
> > > then use this as a parent for whatever devices are behind it, but
> > it
> > > itself will always appear up.
> > That's only marginally different than what I was doing and
> I still get
> > a "Pending" label in my status map for my equivalent of
> some-hub. I
> > guess my real question boils down to: "What is considered the
> > 'right'
> > way to represent objects in my status map that can not be actively
> > or
> > passively monitored."
> >
> > Possibly the answer is the above and I should just learn to think
> > of
> > the "Pending" label as denoting that no useful info is available for
> > this component.
>
> just force a check.
You need to assign a service to all hosts, or the Host Status will
remain "Pending" forever. Is this the "status" you're referring to?
Rob Nelson
Network Engineer
Windchannel Communications
919-538-6326
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list