Everything works! But I want more!

Robert Nelson rnelson at windchannel.com
Wed Nov 24 20:03:20 CET 2004


> -----Original Message-----
> From: jeff vier [mailto:boinger at tradingtechnologies.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:53 AM
> To: Ben Hyde
> Cc: nagios-users
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Everything works! But I want more!
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 07:54 -0600, Ben Hyde wrote:
> > > The check_ok command is simply a call to 'check_dummy OK'.  You
> > can
> > > then use this as a parent for whatever devices are behind it, but
> > it
> > > itself will always appear up.
> > That's only marginally different than what I was doing and 
> I still get
> > a "Pending" label in my status map for my equivalent of 
> some-hub.  I  
> > guess my real question boils down to: "What is considered the
> > 'right'  
> > way to represent objects in my status map that can not be actively
> > or  
> > passively monitored."
> > 
> > Possibly the answer is the above and I should just learn to think
> > of   
> > the "Pending" label as denoting that no useful info is available for
> > this component.
> 
> just force a check.

You need to assign a service to all hosts, or the Host Status will
remain "Pending" forever. Is this the "status" you're referring to?

Rob Nelson
Network Engineer
Windchannel Communications
919-538-6326 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list