Everything works! But I want more!
Andreas Ericsson
ae at op5.se
Thu Nov 25 08:16:26 CET 2004
Mark D. Nagel wrote:
> Ben Hyde wrote:
>
>> That's only marginally different than what I was doing and I still get
>> a "Pending" label in my status map for my equivalent of some-hub. I
>> guess my real question boils down to: "What is considered the 'right'
>> way to represent objects in my status map that can not be actively or
>> passively monitored."
>>
>> Possibly the answer is the above and I should just learn to think of
>> the "Pending" label as denoting that no useful info is available for
>> this component.
>
>
> You get Pending even with the host in a hostgroup? You have to include
> it in a hostgroup for it to be checked.
That's just incorrect. The host does NOT have to be in a hostgroup to be
checked. Mark, please don't give false answers. Check the documentation
if you're not sure. Wrong answers leads to all sorts of following
misunderstandings.
> The check should succeed
> always, so it should read as 'OK' in that case.
>
That depends on the check. A check that always return OK just isn't any
good.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Lead Developer
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list