Nagios 2.0 performance
Jason Martin
jhmartin at toger.us
Wed Sep 8 22:42:04 CEST 2004
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:58:17PM -0700, Ben wrote:
> codebase more and trying to decide if I should impliment a scheme with
> shared memory (so that would stay persistant between cgi runs), or a more
> intelligent usage of the database.... say, maybe, using materialized
> views. If anybody else has any suggestions on which path to take, I'm all
> ears....
Remember that 2.0 drops DB support...
-Jason Martin
--
This message is PGP/MIME signed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20040908/ca22e498/attachment.sig>
More information about the Users
mailing list