Nagios and a Microsoft "cluster"

[Hans Engelen]

Could you provide a little more information on the issue at hand ?

A short description of your setup would help. We are defenitly talking about
clustering here right, not load balancing ? The double ping response issue
sounds more like a load balancing issue.

Cheers,
Hans


On 12/8/05, Bill Mathews <billford at billford.com> wrote:
>
> We are trying to monitor (with Nagios, of course) a Microsft web server
> set up in a Microsoft "clustered" environment. We have a couple of
> issues, one is that when try to ping the cluster address we see
> duplicate ping responses:
>
> 64 bytes from www.example.com (1.2.3.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=116 time=32.5 ms
> 64 bytes from www.example.com (1.2.3.4): icmp_seq=3 ttl=116 time=32.8 ms
> (DUP!)
>
> The other issue is that routinely (a few times a day) this site shows as
> down, even though it isn't (confirmed through observation). I am
> somewhat unfamiliar with MS-Clustering but from the description on their
> website it's a lot like any other kind of clustering (we monitor a lot
> of clusters). Anyone every see anything similar? I have some theories
> but none really make a lot of sense in any cluster I am familiar with.
> Thanks in advance for any assistance.
>
> Bill
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20051216/9492feb2/attachment.html>