Problem with nagios recognizing some services
Abkar, Mohamed
Mohamed.Abkar at fns.usda.gov
Sun Mar 13 22:46:14 CET 2005
Hi
While running some service check ,I am getting error messages on the
nagios web interfaces that some services are unknown .
Such as (Task Scheduler ,Event log, Windows Time,IPSEC Services,
Security Accounts Manager), it seems that with other services that have
only one word such as (Sever, Uptime..) I am getting a result .
My question is ,is there any special naming convention on these
particular services ?
Please advise
Thanks in advance
Mohamed
-----Original Message-----
From: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
nagios-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 11:12 PM
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Nagios-users digest, Vol 1 #2511 - 8 msgs
Send Nagios-users mailing list submissions to
nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
nagios-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Nagios-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Network bandwidth utilised by nagios (Vinod Moraes)
2. Re: plugin check_hpjd: Unknown output option passed to -O: Q. :
Timeout from host (Anthony Montibello)
3. Re: nagios gives unknown state - when monitoring over WAN link
(Anthony Montibello)
4. Wrong reading given by nagios (vivek sharma sharma)
5. Re: Wrong reading given by nagios (Jason Feingold)
6. Re: Wrong reading given by nagios (Andreas Ericsson)
7. Re: Multiple host parents / dependencies (Joe Pruett)
8. Hosts notifications (not services) (daviddst at wizard.xinus.net)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:02:29 +0530
From: Vinod Moraes <vinod.moraes at gmail.com>
Reply-To: Vinod Moraes <vinod.moraes at gmail.com>
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Network bandwidth utilised by nagios
Hi
I would like to get some information on the overheads caused on the
network bandwidth by using nagios or Has anyone done a presentation on
the network performance degeradation by using nagios and the benefits
Regards
Vinod
--__--__--
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 03:09:36 -0500
From: Anthony Montibello <amontibello at gmail.com>
Reply-To: Anthony Montibello <amontibello at gmail.com>
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] plugin check_hpjd: Unknown output option
passed to -O: Q. : Timeout from host
I believe he is refering to the patch tracking system in sourceforge for
the official plugins , he submitted several fixes/patches last month
under the request ID: 1143849
if you are unfamiliar with where this is goto:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nagiosplug/
then click on the patches and you should see the reference ID in the
list.
Good Luck
Tony
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:10:40 +0100, Arno Lehmann <al at its-lehmann.de>
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Andre Loss wrote:
>
> > Sorry, yesterday I wasn't a member of this list ;-)
>
> There _is_ an archive...
>
> > I read the thread now, but I don't understand, what Andreas means:
> >
> > "Without coding; Upgrade your snmpget to net-snmp 5.x or apply the
> > patch I submitted to the patch tracker item."
> >
> > I installed the NET::SNMP-Modul yesterday from CPAN, it MUST be the
> > newest ;-)
>
> Sure.
> But he doesn't refer to perl's NET::SNMP, but to the net-snmp package,
> whose programs are used by the nagios plugins.
>
> See http://www.net-snmp.org/ for more information. Or your
> distributions software installation tool.
>
> > What does Andreas mean whith "the patch tracker item"?
>
> Don't know.
>
> Arno
>
> >
> > Andre
> >
> > Werner Flamme wrote:
> >
> >> Andre Loss schrieb am 11.03.2005 11:58:
> >>
> >>> Thank You for Your help for my last problem, but now I have the
> >>> next problem...
> >>>
> >>> The plugin check_hpjd gives the error-message:
> >>>
> >>> "Unknown output option passed to -O: Q. : Timeout from host
> >>> 192.168.10.97"
> >>>
> >>> A ping to the printer works fine. What can I do?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Ande
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Andre,
> >>
> >> this is what I asked yesterday. Did Andreas' hints in Message-id:
> >> <423054F8.3020404 at op5.se> not work for you?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> \/\/erner
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
> > users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
> > reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> > reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk
> > being sent to /dev/null
> >
>
> --
> IT-Service Lehmann al at its-lehmann.de
> Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
> users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
> reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
--__--__--
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 03:32:21 -0500
From: Anthony Montibello <amontibello at gmail.com>
Reply-To: Anthony Montibello <amontibello at gmail.com>
To: Tharanga <tharanga at roomsnet.com>,
Nagios Users List <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] nagios gives unknown state - when monitoring
over WAN link
You can always try using NSCA with a very large timout, If you are
already using NSCA for other things on you system you may want to run a
second one on a non default port that way you can set the timeout
specifically to handle the large lag time. When using NSCA you would
basically run plugins on the remote servers and gather the outputs, then
send all the outputs at once via the send_nsca.
Make sure you adjust your timeout of whatever plugin you are using if
you are getting timeout or no data received from host in your warnings.
Also you may want to change some of the service settings to prevent the
warnings Read through the nagios Documentation on what the different
service settings do.
Hope this helps
Tony
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:39:11 +0600, Tharanga <tharanga at roomsnet.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Iam using nagios to monitor 3 servers in a different country. we have
> a 128 line. but that line is use for various activities..like ftp
> etc.. when i try to monitor remote hosts (out side my country) from my
> nagios server it gives state unknown and cant connect to remote
> hosts,timeouts. after few seconds it gives correct out put (i am using
> snmp to check hard disk,memory..etc). normally my round trip average
> time is more than 500 ms some times its 900ms. i think udp packets get
> lost . if i use NRPE can i solve this problem ?? i cant give priority
> to icmp or udp in my network. is nagios use that much bandwidth for
> monitoring ?? (iam monitoring only 3 servers and and alltogeter
> executing 10 snmp plugins) when i use this in my LAN it gives no
> errors..and gives real data...it indicates that my configuaration is
> ok...when i go over WAN link it gives only amber colour and after few
> seconds it gives ok state..again in few seconds it gives amber...so..i
> cant monitor it well..coninuosly hope u guys can help me to solve
> this...iam using nagios 1.2. i thought to use NRPE ? is this will give
> a better result over WAN ???
>
> thanks in advance
> Tharanga
--__--__--
Message: 4
Date: 12 Mar 2005 15:21:41 -0000
From: "vivek sharma sharma" <vivek_222 at rediffmail.com>
Reply-To: "vivek sharma sharma" <vivek_222 at rediffmail.com>
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Wrong reading given by nagios
This is a multipart mime message
--Next_1110640899---0-202.54.124.151-28856
Content-type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Dear all,=0A I am using Nagios nagios to monitor uptime of few
ro=
uters and switches etc.=0AI am getting two false readings from
Nagios.=0A1.=
) Sometimes it says as time to live exceeded When i have configured 95%
and= 700ms in critical state of check_ping.=0A2.)Secondly I am not
getting any = notification mails from the monitor.=0A=0APlz
suggest.=0A=0AThanks =0AVivek= Sharma.=0A=0A=0A=0A
--Next_1110640899---0-202.54.124.151-28856
Content-type: text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<P>=0ADear all,<BR>=0A I am using
Nagios= nagios to monitor uptime of few routers and switches
etc.<BR>=0AI am getti= ng two false readings from Nagios.<BR>=0A1.)
Sometimes it says as time to l= ive exceeded When i have configured 95%
and 700ms in critical state of chec= k_ping.<BR>=0A2.)Secondly I am not
getting any notification mails from the = monitor.<BR>=0A<BR>=0APlz
suggest.<BR>=0A<BR>=0AThanks <BR>=0AVivek Sharma.=
<BR>=0A<BR>=0A=0A</P>=0A=0A=0A<br><br>=0A<A target=3D"_blank"
HREF=3D"http:= //clients.rediff.com/signature/track_sig.asp"><IMG
SRC=3D"http://ads.rediff=
.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_nx.cgi/www.rediffmail.com/inbox.htm at Bottom"
BOR= DER=3D0 VSPACE=3D0 HSPACE=3D0></a>=0A
--Next_1110640899---0-202.54.124.151-28856--
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:38:17 -0500
From: Jason Feingold <Jason at Acadaca.com>
Organization: Acadaca Internet Solutions
To: vivek sharma sharma <vivek_222 at rediffmail.com>
CC: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Wrong reading given by nagios
vivek sharma sharma wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am using Nagios nagios to monitor uptime of few routers
> and switches etc. I am getting two false readings from Nagios.
> 1.) Sometimes it says as time to live exceeded When i have configured
> 95% and 700ms in critical state of check_ping. 2.)Secondly I am not
> getting any notification mails from the monitor.
Not sure if this is it, but when I experienced the same problem, or at
least thought I had the problem, my setup was fine, I just had the
system falsly configured to send out emails only after the check failed
for a very extended period of time, without realizing.
>
> Plz suggest.
>
> Thanks
> Vivek Sharma.
>
>
>
>
--__--__--
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:52:57 +0100
From: Andreas Ericsson <ae at op5.se>
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Wrong reading given by nagios
vivek sharma sharma wrote:
> Dear all, I am using Nagios nagios to monitor uptime of few routers
> and switches etc. I am getting two false readings from Nagios.
> 1.) Sometimes it says as time to live exceeded When i have configured
> 95% and 700ms in critical state of check_ping.
I assume you're using the check_icmp plugin for this.
Time to live exceeded is what you get if
1) there are routing problems, causing packets to loop indefinitely
between two nodes or two interfaces on the same node. The ttl value was
introduced specifically to prevent this.
2) you have redundant routes to a host, and the "usual" route goes down
while the secondary one is more than whatever default TTL is set on
outgoing packets. You can try increasing the ttl value on outgoing
packets using the -l flag to check_icmp. The maximum value is 255.
> 2.) Secondly I am not getting any notification mails from the monitor.
>
This is a configuration issue. It is impossible to give detailed help
without detailed error info.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Lead Developer
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:06:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Pruett <joey at clean.q7.com>
To: Nagios Users <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Multiple host parents / dependencies
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>=20
> I don't understand why the dependency "doesn't work".
>=20
> If you want the host to be marked unreachable whenever the switch (or
>ITS parent) goes down, then make its parent the switch. This is
>completely independent of the physical connections, layer 2, etc. It's
>just and exactly how Nagios evaluates whether a host is unreachable or
>not. =20
> When you say the router dependency "doesn't work as expected", that
> doesn't give me enough information to even begin to figure out what
the
> problem is. What is "expected" and how does the observed behaviour not
> match it? What exactly is the configuration of the router, switch and
> host? (copy & paste please).
>=20
> Cheers, Chris.
>=20
> On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:20, Daniel W=C3=BCthrich wrote:
> > Hi
> >=20
> > This does not work in our enviroment because we are using vlan. All
> >=20 switches have a management interface and therefore each switch
> >has an=
other =20
> > switch as parent =3D> Layer 2 network Layout (all switches are
> > checke=
d in =20
> > this management network. Therefore a dependency "switch -> host" is
> > n=
ot =20
> > possible.
> >=20
> > I tried to make a hostdependency for the layer 3 (router) dependency
> >=
but =20
> > it doesn't seem to work as I expect.
i have a similar layout and i created "hosts" for each vlan where the
hos= t=20 check is just a ping of the admin interface for the switch.
if the switc= h=20 goes down, all the vlans go down too.
--__--__--
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 05:08:05 +0100
From: daviddst at wizard.xinus.net
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Hosts notifications (not services)
Hi,
I would like to use hosts contact_groups notifications and not services
contact_groups notifications.
I've defined contact_group for each host (no contact_group for
services).
But when I check the configuration, I've got a lot of warnings messages
like this one :
Warning: Service 'SMTP' on host 'myserver' has no default contact
group(s) defined!
And with this configuration, I don't receive any notifications. What
could be the problem ?
Kind regards,
David.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
End of Nagios-users Digest
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list