Performance issues, too

Tobias Klausmann klausman at schwarzvogel.de
Thu Dec 21 12:35:17 CET 2006


Hi! 

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Daniel Meyer wrote:
> > I have the suspicion that our check latency might converge on 419
> > seconds - but I'd rather not test it, we'd be well beyond the
> > 300s-interval most of our checks are designed for.
> 
> Why do you think of exactly 419 seconds?
> 
> And btw, if our problems are related the latency wont stop at that number 
> :)

Because that's the new average check latency as reported by -s.
Yes, I'm out on a limb there.

Regards,
Tobias

-- 
Never touch a burning system.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list