Service checks
Jerad Riggin
jriggin at gmail.com
Fri Nov 2 16:53:39 CET 2007
In that case, is there a way to specify more than one possible string, so
that for example if it can't find "Home", but it can find "Checkout", it
considers the host up?
On 11/2/07, Hari Sekhon <hpsekhon at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> yes you have to use a separate one for each site, how else would you be
> able to use a separate check? Unless you expect the word "Home" on each
> site and that is your string check. Another option is using Macros but I
> suspect this may not do what you want...
>
> -h
>
> Hari Sekhon
>
>
>
> Jerad Riggin wrote:
> > I've read the help docs, like I said I have a working installation
> > checking about 15 servers. I have a PING service that pings a host
> > group. I can't do that with this because I'm checking a different
> > string on each site, so i'm guessing it has to be separated out. Does
> > this make sense?
> >
> > On 11/2/07, *Hari Sekhon* <hpsekhon at googlemail.com
> > <mailto:hpsekhon at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > You need to reread the docs, this is the most basic of questions.
> >
> > http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/xodtemplate.html#service
> >
> > Hint: You are missing a service_description in the last block for
> one.
> > You should not have name in that last block either, you need
> > host_name.
> >
> > Read docs pls.
> >
> > -h
> >
> > Hari Sekhon
> >
> >
> >
> > Jerad Riggin wrote:
> > > I have a functioning nagios setup but I have a quick question. I
> am
> > > going through and adding website string checks so we can keep
> > track of
> > > availability on one of our webservers.
> > >
> > > So in services.cfg I have
> > >
> > > define service{
> > > name generic-service ; Generic
> > > service name
> > > active_checks_enabled 1 ; Active
> > > service checks are enabled
> > > passive_checks_enabled 1 ; Passive
> > > service checks are enabled/accepted
> > > parallelize_check 1 ; Active
> > > service checks should be parallelized (Don't disable)
> > > obsess_over_service 1 ; We
> should
> > > obsess over this service (if necessary)
> > > check_freshness 0 ;
> > Default is
> > > to NOT check service 'freshness'
> > > notifications_enabled 1 ; Service
> > > notifications are enabled
> > > event_handler_enabled 1 ; Service
> > > event handler is enabled
> > > flap_detection_enabled 1 ; Flap
> > > detection is enabled
> > > process_perf_data 1 ; Process
> > > performance data
> > > retain_status_information 1 ; Retain
> > > status information across program restarts
> > > retain_nonstatus_information 1 ; Retain
> > > non-status information across program restarts
> > > register 0 ; DONT
> > > REGISTER THIS DEFINITION - NOT A REAL SERVICE, JUST A TEMPLATE!
> > > }
> > >
> > > define service{
> > > use generic-service
> > > name basic-service
> > > is_volatile 0
> > > check_period 24x7
> > > max_check_attempts 5
> > > normal_check_interval 3
> > > retry_check_interval 1
> > > notification_interval 15
> > > notification_period 24x7
> > > register 0
> > > }
> > >
> > > I then have as just one example:
> > >
> > > define service{
> > > use basic-service
> > > name check-site4
> > > notification_options w,u,c,r
> > > check_command
> > check_http!site.com!20!"Home"
> > > register 0
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > My question is, you notice that I have the name as check-site4,
> and
> > > then later on in the services.cfg I call up that
> > checksite-4. Is this
> > > the correct way? Do I need to define a service for each host
> > and then
> > > later on call it by name to execute the service check? Is this
> > a bad
> > > way of going about it?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jerad
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
> > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
> > browser.
> > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Nagios-users mailing list
> > > Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > <mailto:Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users>
> > > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS
> > when reporting any issue.
> > > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to
> > /dev/null
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20071102/d2d7b3a3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list