Nrpe and windows

[Mattias Ryrlén]

Unai Rodriguez skrev:
> Dear Brady,
> 
>> Is anyone using a similar configuration? Does anyone know of a more
>> current project that can facilitate the same monitoring architecture?
> 
> I am currently using NSClient++ (http://trac.nakednuns.org/nscp/).

You can also reach it on http://www.nsclient.org (some companies don't 
like you to surf to naked nuns :))

  I am
> monitoring 48 servers and 675 services with no issues.
> 
> unai
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


-- 
Vänliga hälsningar / Best Regards
Mattias Ryrlén

__________________________
op5 AB
Första Långgatan 19
SE-413 27 Göteborg
Mobil: +46 735-17 70 99
Support: +46 31-774 09 24
www.op5.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null