NetApp disk monitoring
Robert Ferguson
robert.ferguson at replacements.com
Thu Jul 24 18:17:36 CEST 2008
That worked like a charm. Thank you,
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: kyleodonnell at gmail.com [mailto:kyleodonnell at gmail.com] On Behalf
Of kyle.odonnell at gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:49 AM
To: Robert Ferguson
Cc: Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] NetApp disk monitoring
just add the -w -c anywhere, the number 9000 is the total number of
disks, you can alert on each of the returned fields, in this case I
just picked a high number of total disks as I dont care to alert if
the number of disks grows larger than X(9000).
warn on greater than 9000 total disks
warn on greater than 9000 active disks
warn on greater than 9000 spare disks
warn on greater than 0 failed disks
On 7/24/08, Robert Ferguson <robert.ferguson at replacements.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the check I am using
>
> #Number of disks
> Define command{
> command_name check-netapp-numdisk
> command_line $USER1$/check_snmp -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C
> public -o
>
.1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.6.4.1.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.6.4.2.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1
> .6.4.8.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.6.4.7.0 -u 'Total Disks','
> Active','Spare','Failed' -l ""
> }
>
> I can see were to put the '-w 9000,9000,9000,0 -c 9000,9000,9000,2'
from
> you statement, but what is the '9000.....' for?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kyleodonnell at gmail.com [mailto:kyleodonnell at gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of kyle.odonnell at gmail.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:23 AM
> To: Robert Ferguson
> Cc: Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] NetApp disk monitoring
>
> what check are you using? i use snmp:
>
> check_snmp -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C $ARG1$ -t 60 -o
>
.enterprises.789.1.6.4.1.0,.enterprises.789.1.6.4.2.0,.enterprises.789.1
> .6.4.8.0,.enterprises.789.1.6.4.7.0
> -w 9000,9000,9000,0 -c 9000,9000,9000,2 -u 'Total
> Disks','Active','Spare','Failed' -l ""
>
> the last number in the -w/-c represents number of failures (greather
> than)
>
> On 7/24/08, Robert Ferguson <robert.ferguson at replacements.com> wrote:
>> Good Morning Users,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have run into a little snag monitoring our netapps. I am sure it
is
> a
>> simple mistake however her it is.
>>
>>
>>
>> We are monitoring the number of disk on each head of the netapp.
This
>> give us the number of Total, number Active, number Spare and Number
>> Failed. The issue this morning is we had a disk fail over night.
>> Nagios caught it and is reporting 1 failed, however it is still in an
> ok
>> state. I can't find where to set the number for -w and -c. Please
> let
>> me know of your thoughts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list