Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS serverpackagealerts

Randal, Phil prandal at herefordshire.gov.uk
Thu May 1 12:33:32 CEST 2008


Oops,

I realised after I said it.

The only time I used yum on RHEL 4 was to upgrade it to CentOS 4.

CentOS 4, of course, ships with yum.

I've currently got 4 CentOS 4.6 boxes, 2 CentOS 5.1, and 1 RHEL 4 box,
so python 2.3 support would still be a plus.

Phil

--
Phil Randal
Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

-----Original Message-----
From: Hari Sekhon [mailto:hpsekhon at googlemail.com] 
Sent: 01 May 2008 10:40
To: Randal, Phil
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Announce: Check_Yum for RedHat/CentOS
serverpackagealerts

Randal, Phil wrote:
> The latest version now works fine on my CentOS 5.1 boxes.
>
> Now all we need is a version which works with python 2.3 so I can 
> check our CentOS / RHEL 4 boxes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
I have a couple of RHEL 4 boxes too but since they didn't ship with yum
this didn't seem so relevant. I tried putting yum on one of them a
couple of years back and I have to say it was an absolutely awful
experience.

I had done a relatively minimal install and was then tryied installing
yum both by rpm and by source install, both of which landed me in a very
bad and messed up circular dependency hell that I couldn't solve without
breaking some other stuff. I mean I tried everything, and that was the
last time I ever tried a minimal redhat installation (minimal == lower
attack surface and all that best practice stuff which redhat never
seemed to get into - otherwise I have to go round disabling so much junk
on their systems), a very poor choice for tight control and
maintainability compared to gentoo or debian (but I digress).

Did you install yum manually on RHEL 4?
Do you use this as the primary package management tool on RHEL 4 and
does it receive security updates? I would have thought not since RedHat
only shipped this in version 5 which is why the plugin makes no effort
for previous versions of RHEL... but I could be wrong.

I figure that upgrades to the version 5 with it's first half-decent
package management system using yum by default will solve this, but if
anyone wants to correct me or share their experience, feel free and I
may reconsider.

-h

-- 
Hari Sekhon


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list