Antwort: RE: Nagios 3.0.4 performance issue

[Sascha.Runschke at gfkl.com]

"Alloo, Vincent" <v-alloo at ti.com> schrieb am 19.11.2008 14:44:35:

> I have the nrpe.cfg config file on NFS. I’d like to not send 
> notifications for all my NRPE checks in case of NFS failure.
> So my intent was to gate notifications on one single check using 
> NRPE on NFS (check_uname on svxnagios02). If this check is failing, 
> notifications will not be sent for the others.
> I’ve found servicegroup as the best way to code this dependency.

Ah, my bad - I've read your configuration too hastily.
But you do know that this means you have actually 3600
more checks to do then without this dependency, as 3600
checks will initiate a dependency check on the check_uname
service if your predictive caching window is not big enough.
Should your machine be able to handle 3600 more active checks
that easily or do you have a big enough caching window?

Regards
        Sascha

PS: The best way would be to not have config files sitting on 
single-point-of-failure NFS
shares ;)

-- 
Sascha Runschke
IT-Infrastruktur

fon      : +49 (201) / 102-1879
fax      : +49 (201) / 102-1102105
mobil : +49 (173) / 5419665



GFKL Financial Services AG
Vorstand: Dr. Peter Jänsch (Vors.), Jürgen Baltes, Dr. Till Ergenzinger, Dr. Tom Haverkamp
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dr. Georg F. Thoma
Sitz: Limbecker Platz 1, 45127 Essen, Amtsgericht Essen, HRB 13522
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null