yet another Error 127 issue

[Scott Macdonald]

So here's the problem..  host checks run without a problem..  but
service checks come back with Status code 127..  the binaries exist and
I have tested them with my nagios user..  even in full debug output, the
expanded command runs when copied and pasted to the cli.

 

The biggest head scratcher is that is worked fine until I started to set
my environment up to be distributed and was having this issue on one of
nsca sender..  so I switched back the configs to make this the poller
and display, but now I cannot get service checks to run at all... 

 

The machine is monitoring ~4500 hosts and ~9000 service checks (you can
see why I wanted to move to a distributed setup)

 

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

 

 

Scott Macdonald 

Senior UNIX Systems Administrator

smacdonald at ask.com <mailto:username at ask.com>  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20080908/70dda145/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1856 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20080908/70dda145/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null