Reporting for redundant hosts
Andreas Ericsson
ae at op5.se
Fri May 21 10:26:55 CEST 2010
On 05/20/2010 06:28 PM, Stephan Tesch wrote:
> Am 20.05.2010 11:32, schrieb Assaf Flatto:
>
> Hello Assaf,
>
>> One approach is to monitor a VIP for the service (i.e. the "clustered"
>> ip of the external facing IP address of the routers) for finding if the
>> service is up , and the individual devices by their direct IP for each
>> device activity .
>>
>> This will give you both the business view ( if the VIP is down then the
>> business is impacted) , and the operational view ( one device impacted ).
>>
> This is for sure a good idea. On the other hand this would mean that we
> have to monitor another "host" and also plan for downtimes of this host,
> too. An approach where I just define the redundant hosts and get the
> report that I need would in my opinion be the better one. The data is
> all there, it just has to be evaluated. I really can't believe, that I'm
> the only one with this problem?
>
You're not. Ninja has cluster-mode capabilities in its reporting tool.
Check it out if you're interested. Adding such a feature to the cgi's
would be more hassle than it's worth, and I sure as hell won't get the
time for it from work since we already have it in our own reporting
solution.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list