Hashing, take 2

[Andre Bergei]

Sorry for doubleposting, I somehow managed to unintentionally activate the shortcut for "Send" in outlook for the n'th time :/

> > Hi.
> > 
> > Does this patch speed up the cgi's?
> 
> Slightly, yes, but a different amount on different systems based on 
> the conditions below. The greatest benefit will be for systems that 
> accept a receive a large amount of passive checks though.

You mean it will speed up the processing of passive checks?
That is good news for us with distributed setups :)

> > If so i'm willing to take it for a spin and report my findings.
> > 
> 
> Please do. The main issue at hand here is stability at first. 
> If this patch works out well we can start chopping up the code to be 
> better compartmentalized and each section of it can then be optimized 
> to the extremes wrt both resources and speed without having to gamble 
> with stability.

With summer comes spare time, yay :)
I've finally got around to testing this patch, and I think i've found a bug.
The deamon starts fine, and nagios -v reports 32616 services and 3033 hosts.

But the cgi's do not show all my services.
The tac.cgi and status.cgi reports a grand totalt of 1024 services :)
Let me know if you need me to do anyting to pinpoint this bug.

As for cgi speed here what I measured :

Status.cgi with hostgroup=all&style=hostdetail

Patched nagios:

real    0m5.596s
user    0m5.510s
sys     0m0.090s

Clean nagios:

real    0m6.523s
user    0m6.450s
sys     0m0.080s

Seems to run a bit faster, as you predicted.

To display all the services for one host takes roughly the same
Amount of time. 


Best
/andrè


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click