freshness check bug?
Bryan Loniewski
brylon at jla.rutgers.edu
Wed May 11 20:21:09 CEST 2005
I'm using NSCA, but as I've mentioned in my original post, I turned OFF receiving any
packets so I could check the behavior of freshness_checking (i.e., my service is not
getting "fresh" results, which is what I want since I'm testing what happens when this
scenario exists for real later on ;)
_________________________
Bryan Loniewski
Rutgers University
NBCS - Systems Programmer
On Wed, 11 May 2005, admin at jpk236.com wrote:
> Bryan,
> You never mentioned, and I forgot to ask. What method are you using
> to send the passive checks from the distributed monitored servers to your
> central server? NSCA? If so, are those servers configured correctly to send
> the data? Is the central server configured correctly to receive the data?
>
> - Justin Kulikowski
> [ http://www.jpk236.com ]
>
> Bryan Loniewski wrote:
>> Regardless of what freshness_threshold I pick (as long as it's not too
>> unrealistic), I just want clarification if a bug exists? (By the way, where
>> do you see the default
>> freshness threshold is 300 sec?). Anyway, I increased the threshold just
>> now to 180
>> seconds and the only thing in my nagios.log was:
>>
>> [1115831032] Finished daemonizing... (New PID=16154)
>> [1115831272] Warning: The results of service 'PROCS-NAGIOS' on host
>> 'csstest2' are stale
>> by 60 seconds (threshold=180 seconds). I'm forcing an immediate check of
>> the service.
>>
>> So it did not even execute my eventhandler once? I'm getting very
>> inconsistent results!
>>
>> NRPE and check_by_ssh are not acceptable methods for distributed monitoring
>> in our
>> environment.
>>
>> Thanks for the comments... Justin
>>
>> _________________________
>> Bryan Loniewski
>> Rutgers University
>> NBCS - Systems Programmer
>>
>> On Wed, 11 May 2005, admin at jpk236.com wrote:
>>
>>> Bryan, A freshness_threshold of 60 seconds might be a little
>>> unrealistic. The default value for the threshold is 300 seconds (5
>>> minutes).
>>> If you want almost real-time stats, which appears to be what you're
>>> going for, perhaps you want to try NRPE or check_by_ssh as an alternative
>>> method of doing distributed monitoring.
>>>
>>> - Justin Kulikowski
>>> [ http://www.jpk236.com ]
>>>
>>> Bryan Loniewski wrote:
>>>
>>>> While trying to setup failover in a distributed environment, I came
>>>> across the following
>>>> problem (bug?) involving freshness checking.
>>>>
>>>> Note: The host that this is setup on is NOT receiving any passive checks
>>>> while I am
>>>> testing the freshness checking.. so the results are always stale forcing
>>>> the freshness
>>>> check everytime.
>>>>
>>>> Note2: Relevant config snippets are under my .sig
>>>>
>>>> Trying to configure (passive) service freshness checking to execute an
>>>> eventhandler
>>>> works correctly for 1 or 2 iterations.. BUT no more than that. It seems
>>>> to stop checking
>>>> the freshness after at most 3 iterations and stops executing the
>>>> eventhandler after at most 2 iterations. I've replicated this behavior
>>>> (too) many times and the results are
>>>> inconsistent.
>>>>
>>>> Below is the output of my nagios log:
>>>>
>>>> <snip nagios.log>
>>>> [1115822708] Finished daemonizing... (New PID=15941)
>>>> [1115822828] Warning: The results of service 'PROCS-NAGIOS' on host
>>>> 'csstest2' are stale
>>>> by 60 seconds (threshold=60 seconds). I'm forcing an immediate check of
>>>> the service.
>>>> [1115822838] SERVICE ALERT:
>>>> csstest2;PROCS-NAGIOS;CRITICAL;SOFT;1;CRITICAL
>>>> [1115822838] SERVICE EVENT HANDLER:
>>>> csstest2;PROCS-NAGIOS;CRITICAL;SOFT;1;slave-failover
>>>> [1115822948] Warning: The results of service 'PROCS-NAGIOS' on host
>>>> 'csstest2' are stale
>>>> by 60 seconds (threshold=60 seconds). I'm forcing an immediate check of
>>>> the service.
>>>>
>>>> Notice the freshness check ran ONLY 2 times when it should have run 5 (if
>>>> you look at my
>>>> config options below) and the eventhandler ran ONLY 1 time, when it
>>>> should have ran 3 times.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone verify (disprove) this behavior? Am I missing something?
>>>>
>>>> _________________________
>>>> Bryan Loniewski
>>>> Rutgers University
>>>> NBCS - Systems Programmer
>>>>
>>>> <snip nagios.cfg>
>>>> check_service_freshness=1
>>>> service_freshness_check_interval=60
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> <snip objects.cfg>
>>>> define service{
>>>> name generic-service
>>>> parallelize_check 1
>>>> obsess_over_service 1
>>>> check_freshness 0
>>>> freshness_threshold 60
>>>> notifications_enabled 1
>>>> event_handler_enabled 1
>>>> flap_detection_enabled 1
>>>> failure_prediction_enabled 1
>>>> process_perf_data 1
>>>> retain_status_information 1
>>>> retain_nonstatus_information 1
>>>> is_volatile 0
>>>> max_check_attempts 5
>>>> normal_check_interval 2
>>>> retry_check_interval 1
>>>> check_period 24x7
>>>> contact_groups super-admins
>>>> notification_interval 3
>>>> notification_period 24x7
>>>> register 0
>>>> }
>>>> define service{
>>>> use generic-service
>>>> name generic-passive-service
>>>> active_checks_enabled 0
>>>> passive_checks_enabled 1
>>>> register 0
>>>> }
>>>> define service{
>>>> use generic-passive-service
>>>> host_name csstest2
>>>> service_description PROCS-NAGIOS
>>>> check_freshness 1
>>>> freshness_threshold 60
>>>> check_command check_dummy!2
>>>> event_handler slave-failover
>>>> }
>>>> define command{
>>>> command_name check_dummy
>>>> command_line $USER1$/check_dummy $ARG1$
>>>> }
>>>> define command{
>>>> command_name slave-failover
>>>> command_line $USER2$/failover $SERVICESTATE$
>>>> $SERVICESTATETYPE$
>>>> }
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
>>>> Want to be the first software developer in space?
>>>> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nagios-devel mailing list
>>>> Nagios-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-devel
>>>
>>>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
More information about the Developers
mailing list