notification_interval check vs. check_period interval check - config.c
Hendrik Bäcker
andurin at process-zero.de
Fri Sep 12 11:13:25 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Marcel schrieb:
> I think i've found a bug.
>
> in config.c:
>
> At line #1878, temp_service->check_interval is incorrectly assuming
> interval_lenght=60, but if one would use an interval_length directive
> equals to 1, then the Warnings like: "[1220575781] Warning: Service
> 'Current Load' on host 'faeroes' has a notification interval less than
> its check interval! Notifications are only re-sent after checks are
> made, so the effective notification interval will be that of the check
> interval." will incorrectly shows up, because the conditional below
> assumes interval_lenght = 60.
>
Do have a configuration example to rebuild your mentioned problem?
I am using interval_length=1 and doesn't recognize any of your warning
messages cause of mismatching check/notification interval.
- -
Hendrik
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjKMrUACgkQlI0PwfxLQjlTwwCdE3+gfgvvyY1V59CJuGMpiIDX
EA8AnAxTSvty04iigDbf+/Tc87EkQXgn
=X5q2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
More information about the Developers
mailing list