[naemon-dev] Naemon-dev Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1

[Deepak Kosaraju]

On 2014-07-18 13:00, Olivier LAHAYE wrote:
> 
> I've integrated it on OSCAR Cluster (unstable release), and so far, no problem 
> at all. Works fine on centos-6, centos-7, fedora-19, fedora-20
> 
> That's awesome!
> 
> God, how I love stuff getting used :-)

Olivier can you share your documentation (or) hand note you use to setup OSCAR cluster for naemon. It helps people in community to implement similar clusters for neamon.


With Regards
Deepak Kosaraju

On Aug 7, 2014, at 3:00, naemon-dev-request at monitoring-lists.org wrote:

> Send Naemon-dev mailing list submissions to
> 	naemon-dev at monitoring-lists.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.monitoring-lists.org/list/listinfo/naemon-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	naemon-dev-request at monitoring-lists.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	naemon-dev-owner at monitoring-lists.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Naemon-dev digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re:  next release? (Andreas Ericsson)
>   2. Re:  next release? (Andreas Ericsson)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:30:23 +0200
> From: Andreas Ericsson <ageric79 at gmail.com>
> To: Naemon Development <naemon-dev at monitoring-lists.org>
> Subject: Re: [naemon-dev] next release?
> Message-ID: <53E3391F.8090101 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> On 2014-07-18 12:57, Sven Nierlein wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> any news on this? The Debian team is thinking about replacing Nagios with Naemon,
>> but asked for a stable 1.0 release for this. Schedule would be end of august
>> at the lastest.
>> Can we do this? The Gui part is completed. Livestatus is also ok.
>> 
> 
> Let me get the timeperiod patches in and then go for 1.0. I should be
> done with that this week.
> 
> I'll rip out get_next_valid_time() and get_next_invalid_time(), bump
> checks by their intended interval and when that interval comes around
> we'll make a check to see if it's valid then. That'll get rid of the
> DST bugs and the exceptionally slow restarts which only happen when
> you have a multitude of hosts and services that are outside their
> scheduled period due to exceptions in exclusions.
> 
> I'll actually leave them in to preserve API compatibility, but they
> won't be used by anything and I'll mark them as obsoleted in the
> headers.
> 
> /Andreas
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:31:12 +0200
> From: Andreas Ericsson <ageric79 at gmail.com>
> To: olivier.lahaye at cea.fr,  Naemon Development
> 	<naemon-dev at monitoring-lists.org>
> Subject: Re: [naemon-dev] next release?
> Message-ID: <53E33950.2010908 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> On 2014-07-18 13:00, Olivier LAHAYE wrote:
>> 
>> I've integrated it on OSCAR Cluster (unstable release), and so far, no problem 
>> at all. Works fine on centos-6, centos-7, fedora-19, fedora-20
>> 
> 
> That's awesome!
> 
> God, how I love stuff getting used :-)
> 
> /Andreas
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Naemon-dev mailing list
> Naemon-dev at monitoring-lists.org
> https://www.monitoring-lists.org/list/listinfo/naemon-dev
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Naemon-dev Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
> *****************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/naemon-dev/attachments/20140807/e6c639a5/attachment.html>