Any experiences with check_udp
Christophe Le Guern
cleguern at artful.net
Tue Sep 10 17:49:55 CEST 2002
it seems that Terminal server uses TCP/3389
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q150543&
christophe
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:05:00 +0200
"ZIEGENBEIN, Kurt" <kurt.ziegenbein at saarstahl.de> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've some kind of trouble with the check_udp plugin. I want to check
> a W2k-Terminalserver (1604/UDP), but it seems that the way I use the
> plugin isn't correct.
>
> I made the following tests with the "well-known-port" 53 (DNS), so that
> I can be sure that there is nothing special with w2k.
>
> The command (direct from shell) "check_udp <ip> -p 54" exits directly
> with "No response from host on port 54". Thats ok, because there is nothing
> listening.
>
> The command "check_udp <ip> -p 53" waits for the timeout (10 sec) and then
> exits with "No data was recieved from host! No response from host on port
> 53"
>
> Where is the problem?
>
> Since the code for check_udp didn't change in the past half year, I don't
> expect bugs there...
>
> Kurt
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
More information about the Users
mailing list