Change timeout alerts from CRITICAL to WARNING
Nolan Martin
Nolan.Martin at co.travis.tx.us
Thu Sep 26 19:41:49 CEST 2002
I am just now getting around to trying to implement the workaround
Nathan suggested awhile back, and have been unsuccessful so far.
I modified the check_ping.c file, lines 119 through 122 to the
following:
if (pl >= cpl || rta >= crta)
result = STATE_CRITICAL;
else if (pl >= wpl || rta >= wrta || rta < 0)
result = STATE_WARNING;
Basically, I moved the rta < 0 statement from resulting in a CRITICAL
state to resulting in a WARNING state, assuming that that the rta < 0
statement is what is determining a timeout.
I then recompiled the plugins and copied over the new check_ping
executable to libexec. However, timeouts continue to generate CRITICAL
alerts, and not WARNING alerts.
Admittedly, I have limited development experience, particularly with C.
Can you tell me if I am completely off base or just missing some steps?
I would greatly appreciate the additional assistance.
Nolan Martin
>>> nathan <nathan at sysadminsith.org> 08/20/02 04:35PM >>>
To stop the spam of alerts I recompiled my plugins so that timeouts
were
warnings and not critical then setup my contacts to not get alerted on
service warnings.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:24:20PM -0500, Nolan Martin wrote:
> I've seen this issue pop up several times in the archives, but
without
> any apparent resolution... Perhaps someone can shed some light this
> time.
>
> I receive on-going (unexpected and undesired) service alerts due to
> timed out plugins. This occurs for pretty much any service,
including
> the check_ping, the check_http and check_nwstat (for abends, etc.).
>
> The problem is that the plugin timed out alerts do not seem to
follow
> the max_check_attempts for the service. So, even if the previous
ping
> was okay, if the next ping check generates a time out, it
immediately
> generates a service alert (despite the fact that max_check_attempts
is
> set to 5.
>
> Can someone tell me if this is working as designed, a bug, or
(always
> unlikely) administrator error?
>
> I am currently running Nagios 1.0b3 on Red Hat Linux 7.3.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Nolan
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
--
Nathan
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
More information about the Users
mailing list