nagios && rrd
Subhendu Ghosh
sghosh at sghosh.org
Tue Apr 15 21:10:57 CEST 2003
Mark, John
Thanks for the feedback - feedback is always useful.
-sg
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, John Sellens wrote:
> As I understand APAN, the service check and the RRD update happen
> at the same time. Separating the RRD update from the "real time"
> service check may smooth system performance somewhat - it would
> even allow the graphing/history to be on a separate machine. And
> using the existing perfdata mechanism may provide a more flexible
> interface - it would decouple the reporting (RRD, whatever) from
> the service checks.
>
> I think both approaches, APAN and perfdata/Orca/whatever, likely
> have merits and drawbacks, and may (or may not) be appropriate
> for different circumstances. I'm not sure we (any of us) know
> what the "best" answer is, so I was kind of looking at this as
> somewhat of a research project. i.e. It might be a dead end, but
> I think it would likely give us some useful information that
> may help provide an even better solution in the end.
>
> i.e. I don't think of these as competing approaches, but as
> complementary approaches.
>
> Cheers
>
> John
> jsellens at generalconcepts.com
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list