Dans Guardian - Proxy Flitering Software
Marc Powell
mpowell at ena.com
Wed Feb 12 14:55:53 CET 2003
I think the key is going to be whether squid is set up in transparent mode or forward proxy mode. The checks I use are for foward proxy ports as opposed to transparent (I'm checkind about a hundred or so devices throughout our network). If its transparent, yours will likely work.
--
Marc
Sent from a very tiny wireless device with a very tiny unlit keyboard.
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl DeBisschop <karl at debisschop.net>
To: Robert S. Galloway <securityguy at ikano.com>
CC: Marc Powell <mpowell at ena.com>; 'Nagios List' <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wed Feb 12 05:45:08 2003
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Dans Guardian - Proxy Flitering Software
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 00:31, Robert S. Galloway wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I am using today's CVS snapshot of the plugins
> (200302111100) and Nagios 1.0. Here is the command and output that I get.
>
> ------
>
> ./check_http -I 209.210.176.32 --onredirect follow -p 8888 -w 20 -c 30 -t 35
> -u http://www.cnn.com -s html -v
./plugins/check_http -I 209.210.176.32 --onredirect follow -p 8888 -w 5 -c 6 -t 7 -H www.cnn.com -u / -s html -v
I have done very little proxy checking, so you probably know something
about the desired syntax that I don't. But I think I would have used the
following sysntax
./plugins/check_http -I 209.210.176.32 -p 8888 \
-w 5 -c 6 -t 7 -v \
-H www.cnn.com -u / -s html
(Note that for diagnostic puorposes I'm not following the redirect in
this test either.)
Is the above construction wrong? Can you try it if it seems reasonable??
--
Karl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20030212/6920022e/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list