check_citrix doesn't return any data?

[Stanley Hopcroft]

Dear All,

I am writing to say that there is unfortunately _no_ new version of 
check_citrix.

My remarks about this matter were base don the fact that my production 
Nag setup was using a pre-release version that lacked the enhancements 
of the release version (either that in the Nagios plugin CVS [1.1] or 
the one Mr De Blende was beta testing 1.7.x).

 On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:04:08AM +0100, Tom DE BLENDE wrote:
> 
> > Are you interested in testing a new version ?
> 
> I am :-)
> 

Unfortunately there is no new version because at this stage there are no 
known bugs or requests for enhancements.

Mr De Angelis is unquestionably having trouble with the plugin but 
nothing as convinced me yet that the plugin is not performing as 
advertised. 


> Kind regards,
> Tom

Yours sincerely.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stanley Hopcroft
------------------------------------------------------------------------

'...No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the
continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a
manor of thy friend's or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes
me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know
for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee...'

from Meditation 17, J Donne.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE  SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your  SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null