Dependency problem
Paul L. Allen
pla at softflare.com
Thu Apr 8 14:40:07 CEST 2004
Andreas Ericsson writes:
> Done.
We shall see...
>> But in your first response to me here, you called me an
>> idiot. Pot, etc.
>
> A baldfaced lie.
So I only imagined that you called me an idiot for not closing off
a minor security hole which, if anyone could exploit it, already meant
they had a better exploit they could use. Yeah, I must have imagined
that long thread where it slowly dawned upon you that out here in the
real world monitored servers run all the services that the monitoring
server does and more, and that if somebody can exploit the monitoring
server they can also exploit the monitoring servers without needing to
go through the replace-the-public-key rigmarole that you thought was
so important.
Either you have a very bad memory or the liar is you, not me.
--
Paul Allen
Softflare Support
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list