New member and a question
Jason Martin
jhmartin at toger.us
Sat Aug 7 17:44:56 CEST 2004
I suppose there could be a clause in your contract that says
"You shall not employ automated monitoring tools". Otherwise it
would _seem_ that you can monitor it at a reasonable interval.
Once per second wouldn't be reasonable, but a check interval of
several minutes should be fine.
-Jason Martin
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:15:19AM -0500, C. Bensend wrote:
>
> > And I asked myself a question, sorry, not really technical, but legal or
> > deontological: could my web hosting company (which is NOT my employer) say
> > something against the fact that I'm using Nagios (or any monitoring
> > system)
> > to monitor my site (my own domain and only IP) ? could they consider it
> > as
> > an intrusion ?
> > I just monitor the ping, HTTP, FTP, pop3 and smtp
>
> I suppose they could complain, but aren't they _providing those services
> to the public_ anyway?
>
> Nagios can get a little noisy in the logs, but they could probably filter
> that out...
>
> Benny
>
>
--
Random access is the optimum of the mass storages.
This message is PGP/MIME signed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20040807/fdd8184b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Users
mailing list