Mail response time
Andreas Ericsson
ae at op5.se
Tue Dec 7 02:21:40 CET 2004
Jamie Roughan wrote:
> Currently it takes about 5 minutes to receive mail notificatin from nagios.
> I would like to receive mail after 1 minute .
>
> Is the parameter for accomplishing this located in the main nagios.cfg ?
> Is it the command_check_interval ? If not which parameter controls email
> notification response?
>
The time that passes from the first time an error is detected to the
time the first notification is sent is (assuming you have no
dependencies stalling things otherwise) can be calculated thus;
seconds = interval_length * retry_check_interval * max_check_attempts
interval_length is configured in nagios.cfg
retry_check_interval and max_check_attempts is defined on a per service
basis. Host checks are executed serially, so they don't have the
retry_check_interval.
This is done to prevent false alerts. On many (all?) services available
in a network it's a good idea to do things this way, since most (all?)
networks are susceptible to temporary failure which corrects itself
before it can actually affect production to any greater degree (packet
loss due to high load while backups are running, for instance).
If you have a couple of services that are so critical that you
immediately want notifications for them, I suggest you set
max_check_attempts to 1 for them and then get ready to delete a lot of
false positives.
> -merci beaucoup
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
> nagios-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 6:39 AM
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Nagios-users digest, Vol 1 #2363 - 26 msgs
>
>
> Send Nagios-users mailing list submissions to
> nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> nagios-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of Nagios-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Antwort: [Nagios-users] sms_client scripts [Virus scanned] (Sascha
> Runschke)
> 2. hosts dependancies not working (Ralf Gross)
> 3. Antwort: [Nagios-users] hosts dependancies not working [Virus scanned]
> (Sascha Runschke)
> 4. Re: hosts dependancies not working [Virus scanned] (Ralf Gross)
> 5. $HOSTADDRESS$ in notes_url in hostextinfo
> (florian.beese at infoconsult.nu)
> 6. Re: $HOSTADDRESS$ in notes_url in hostextinfo (Andreas Ericsson)
> 7. check_command in Nagios 1.2 (Sergey Semenyuk)
> 8. Re: check_command in Nagios 1.2 (Stephan Janosch)
> 9. RE: check_command in Nagios 1.2 (Sergey Semenyuk)
> 10. RE: check_command in Nagios 1.2 (Marc Powell)
> 11. RE: check_command in Nagios 1.2 (Sergey Semenyuk)
> 12. RE: check_command in Nagios 1.2 (Marc Powell)
> 13. Antwort: Re: [Nagios-users] hosts dependancies not working [Virus
> scanned] (Sascha Runschke)
> 14. RE: check_command in Nagios 1.2 (Sergey Semenyuk)
> 15. Monitoring ports & BGP on Cisco (Thomas Earl)
> 16. Re: $HOSTADDRESS$ in =?utf-8?b?bm90ZXNfdXJs?= in hostextinfo (Moshe
> Sharon)
> 17. Re: hosts dependancies not working [Virus scanned] (Dan Stromberg)
> 18. Notifications not reaching me (Gary Lawrence Murphy)
> 19. nagios perf data output (Daniel maher)
> 20. Re: Notifications not reaching me (Jan Scholten)
> 21. Compaq Smart Array Drives under Linux (Stork, Johnny [PH])
> 22. Re: Notifications not reaching me (Gary Lawrence Murphy)
> 23. Re: Notifications not reaching me (Gary Lawrence Murphy)
> 24. Re: Notifications not reaching me (Gary Lawrence Murphy)
> 25. Re: Templates for Web Interface (Wil Cooley)
> 26. RE: Re: Templates for Web Interface (Nathan Oyler)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> To: Mark Maas <mark at menem.mine.nu>
> Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Antwort: [Nagios-users] sms_client scripts [Virus scanned]
> From: "Sascha Runschke" <srunschke at abit.de>
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:52:36 +0100
>
> This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> --=_alternative 0030C2EBC1256F62_=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hello Mark,
>
> seeing that noone answered you I'll try to give you some directions :)
>
> Does Nagios have the correct permissions to access the modem? Does
> sms=5Fclient work from the command-line (try as nagios user, not=20 root!).
>
> I am not familiar with sms=5Fclient, but I somehow miss the number in your =
>
> config.
> Does sms=5Fclient have its own addressbook?
>
> sash
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Sascha Runschke
> Netzwerk Administration
> IT-Services
>
> ABIT AG
> Robert-Bosch-Str. 1
> 40668 Meerbusch
>
> Tel.:+49 (0) 2150.9153.226
> mailto:SRunschke at abit.de
>
> http://www.abit.net
> http://www.abit-epos.net
> http://www.my-academy.net
> --------------------------------------------------
> Der Inhalt dieser Email sowie die Anh=E4nge sind ausschlie=DFlich f=FCr den=
> =20 bezeichneten Adressaten bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene
> Adressat=20 dieser Email oder dessen Vertreter sein sollten, so beachten Sie
> bitte,=20 da=DF jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, Ver=F6ffentlichung,
> Vervielf=E4ltigung = oder=20 Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser Email
> unzul=E4ssig ist. Wir m=F6chten Sie=20 au=DFerdem darauf hinweisen, da=DF
> die Kommunikation per Email =FCber das=20 Internet unsicher ist, da fuer
> unberechtigte Dritte grunds=E4tzlich die=20 M=F6glichkeit der Kenntnisnahme
> und Manipulation besteht. Wenn Sie diese=20 Nachricht versehentlich
> erhalten, informieren Sie bitte den Absender und=20 l=F6schen diese
> Nachricht mit den Anh=E4ngen. Herzlichen Dank
>
> The information and any attachments contained in this email are intended=20
> solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is=20
> unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any form of=20
> disclosure, reproduction, distribution or any action taken or refrained=20
> from in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. We also like to =
>
> inform you that communication via email over the internet is insecure=20
> because third parties may have the possibility to access and manipulate=20
> emails. If you have received the message in error, please advise the=20
> sender and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you very much.
> --=_alternative 0030C2EBC1256F62_=
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Hello Mark,</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">seeing that noone answered you I'll =
> try to give you some directions :)</font> <br> <br><font size=3D2
> face=3D"sans-serif">Does Nagios have the correct permiss= ions to access the
> modem?</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Does sms=5Fclient work
> from the comm= and-line (try as nagios user, not root!).</font> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">I am not familiar with sms=5Fclient,=
> but I somehow miss the number in your config.</font> <br><font size=3D2
> face=3D"sans-serif">Does sms=5Fclient have its own addre= ssbook?</font>
> <br> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">sash</font> <br> <br><font
> size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">------------------------------------=
> --------------<br>
> Sascha Runschke<br>
> Netzwerk Administration<br>
> IT-Services<br>
> <br>
> ABIT AG<br>
> Robert-Bosch-Str. 1<br>
> 40668 Meerbusch<br>
> <br>
> Tel.:+49 (0) 2150.9153.226<br>
> mailto:SRunschke at abit.de<br>
> <br>
> http://www.abit.net<br>
> http://www.abit-epos.net<br>
> http://www.my-academy.net<br>
> --------------------------------------------------<br>
> Der Inhalt dieser Email sowie die Anh=E4nge sind ausschlie=DFlich f=FCr den=
> bezeichneten Adressaten bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat =
> dieser Email oder dessen Vertreter sein sollten, so beachten Sie bitte, da=
> =DF jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, Ver=F6ffentlichung, Vervielf=E4ltigu=
> ng oder Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser Email unzul=E4ssig ist. Wir m=F6chten=
> Sie au=DFerdem darauf hinweisen, da=DF die Kommunikation per Email =FCber =
> das Internet unsicher ist, da fuer unberechtigte Dritte grunds=E4tzlich die=
> M=F6glichkeit der Kenntnisnahme und Manipulation besteht. Wenn Sie diese N=
> achricht versehentlich erhalten, informieren Sie bitte den Absender und l=
> =F6schen diese Nachricht mit den Anh=E4ngen. Herzlichen Dank<br> <br> The
> information and any attachments contained in this email are intended so=
> lely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized=
> . If you are not the intended recipient, any form of disclosure, reproducti=
> on, distribution or any action taken or refrained from in reliance on it, i=
> s prohibited and may be unlawful. We also like to inform you that communica=
> tion via email over the internet is insecure because third parties may have=
> the possibility to access and manipulate emails. If you have received the =
> message in error, please advise the sender and delete the message and any a=
> ttachments. Thank you very much.</font> --=_alternative 0030C2EBC1256F62_=--
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:30:03 +0100 (CET)
> From: "Ralf Gross" <Ralf-Lists at RalfGross.de>
> To: <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: [Nagios-users] hosts dependancies not working
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up host dependencies for a couple of of hosts behind
> routers/firewalls. define hostdependency{
> hostgroup_name test
> dependent_host_name router1,fw,router2
> notification_failure_criteria d,u,o
> }
>
> The group test contains 2 hosts behind a router. To test the dependency I
> created a iptables rule that first rejects icmp packets from router1 and
> later, when router1 is down, rejects packets from hosts in the hostgroup.
> The dependeny is also displayed in the cgi interface (view config).
>
> The logfile shows the following:
>
> HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;1;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 seco=
> nds HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10
> seco= nds HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;3;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after
> 10 seco= nds HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;4;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out
> after 10 seco= nds HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;5;CRITICAL - Plugin timed
> out after 10 seco= nds HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;6;CRITICAL - Plugin
> timed out after 10 seco= nds HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;7;CRITICAL -
> Plugin timed out after 10 seco= nds HOST ALERT: router1;DOWN;SOFT;8;CRITICAL
> - Plugin timed out after 10 seco= nds HOST ALERT:
> router1;DOWN;HARD;9;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 seco= nds SERVICE
> ALERT: router1;PING;CRITICAL;HARD;1;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10
> seconds Ok, the dependent host is down. Now I started blocking icmp packets
> from the client test1 behinde router1: HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;1;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;2;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;3;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;4;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;5;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;6;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;7;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;SOFT;8;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST ALERT:
> test1;DOWN;HARD;9;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 second= s HOST
> NOTIFICATION: Gross;test1;DOWN;host-notify-by-sms;CRITICAL - Plugin timed
> out after 10 secondsHOST NOTIFICATION: Gross;test1;DOWN;notify-by-w=
> inpopup;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 secondsHOST NOTIFICATION:
> Gross;test1;DOWN;host-notify= -by-email;CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10
> secondsSERVICE ALERT: test1;PING;CRITICAL;HARD;1;CRITI= CAL - Plugin timed
> out after 10 seconds Host test1 is down and the dependent host router1 too!
> No host notifications should be sent out, or am I wrong? Any ideas what I
> might be doing wrong?
>
>
> One more question. I'm using o as Option for notification_failure_criteria.
> Is that necessary to supress recovery notifications, or is d,u sufficient?
> Thanks, Ralf
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> To: "Ralf Gross" <Ralf-Lists at RalfGross.de>
> Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Antwort: [Nagios-users] hosts dependancies not working [Virus
> scanned]
> From: "Sascha Runschke" <srunschke at abit.de>
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:46:09 +0100
>
> This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> --=_alternative 004BA362C1256F62_=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hello Ralf,
>
> why are you using host dependencies in the first place?
> You should use parent relationships for such an environment.
>
> sash
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Sascha Runschke
> Netzwerk Administration
> IT-Services
>
> ABIT AG
> Robert-Bosch-Str. 1
> 40668 Meerbusch
>
> Tel.:+49 (0) 2150.9153.226
> mailto:SRunschke at abit.de
>
> http://www.abit.net
> http://www.abit-epos.net
> http://www.my-academy.net
> --------------------------------------------------
> Der Inhalt dieser Email sowie die Anh=E4nge sind ausschlie=DFlich f=FCr den=
> =20 bezeichneten Adressaten bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene
> Adressat=20 dieser Email oder dessen Vertreter sein sollten, so beachten Sie
> bitte,=20 da=DF jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, Ver=F6ffentlichung,
> Vervielf=E4ltigung = oder=20 Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser Email
> unzul=E4ssig ist. Wir m=F6chten Sie=20 au=DFerdem darauf hinweisen, da=DF
> die Kommunikation per Email =FCber das=20 Internet unsicher ist, da fuer
> unberechtigte Dritte grunds=E4tzlich die=20 M=F6glichkeit der Kenntnisnahme
> und Manipulation besteht. Wenn Sie diese=20 Nachricht versehentlich
> erhalten, informieren Sie bitte den Absender und=20 l=F6schen diese
> Nachricht mit den Anh=E4ngen. Herzlichen Dank
>
> The information and any attachments contained in this email are intended=20
> solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is=20
> unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any form of=20
> disclosure, reproduction, distribution or any action taken or refrained=20
> from in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. We also like to =
>
> inform you that communication via email over the internet is insecure=20
> because third parties may have the possibility to access and manipulate=20
> emails. If you have received the message in error, please advise the=20
> sender and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you very much.
> --=_alternative 004BA362C1256F62_=
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Hello Ralf,</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">why are you using host dependencies =
> in the first place?</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">You should
> use parent relationships = for such an environment.</font> <br> <br><font
> size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">sash</font> <br> <br><font size=3D2
> face=3D"sans-serif">------------------------------------=
> --------------<br>
> Sascha Runschke<br>
> Netzwerk Administration<br>
> IT-Services<br>
> <br>
> ABIT AG<br>
> Robert-Bosch-Str. 1<br>
> 40668 Meerbusch<br>
> <br>
> Tel.:+49 (0) 2150.9153.226<br>
> mailto:SRunschke at abit.de<br>
> <br>
> http://www.abit.net<br>
> http://www.abit-epos.net<br>
> http://www.my-academy.net<br>
> --------------------------------------------------<br>
> Der Inhalt dieser Email sowie die Anh=E4nge sind ausschlie=DFlich f=FCr den=
> bezeichneten Adressaten bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat =
> dieser Email oder dessen Vertreter sein sollten, so beachten Sie bitte, da=
> =DF jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, Ver=F6ffentlichung, Vervielf=E4ltigu=
> ng oder Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser Email unzul=E4ssig ist. Wir m=F6chten=
> Sie au=DFerdem darauf hinweisen, da=DF die Kommunikation per Email =FCber =
> das Internet unsicher ist, da fuer unberechtigte Dritte grunds=E4tzlich die=
> M=F6glichkeit der Kenntnisnahme und Manipulation besteht. Wenn Sie diese N=
> achricht versehentlich erhalten, informieren Sie bitte den Absender und l=
> =F6schen diese Nachricht mit den Anh=E4ngen. Herzlichen Dank<br> <br> The
> information and any attachments contained in this email are intended so=
> lely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized=
> . If you are not the intended recipient, any form of disclosure, reproducti=
> on, distribution or any action taken or refrained from in reliance on it, i=
> s prohibited and may be unlawful. We also like to inform you that communica=
> tion via email over the internet is insecure because third parties may have=
> the possibility to access and manipulate emails. If you have received the =
> message in error, please advise the sender and delete the message and any a=
> ttachments. Thank you very much.</font> --=_alternative 004BA362C1256F62_=--
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:06:53 +0100 (CET)
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] hosts dependancies not working [Virus scanned]
> From: "Ralf Gross" <Ralf-Lists at RalfGross.de>
> To: <srunschke at abit.de>
> Cc: <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>
> Hi,
>
> first of all, I found my mistake.
>
> I confused dependent_host_name with host_name! Changing the entries for both
> options did the trick. Stupid me!
>
>>why are you using host dependencies in the first place?
>>You should use parent relationships for such an environment. t.
>
>
> Well, I think hostdependencies are more flexible, but I might be wrong. I
> have to confess that I dicovered the parent option after trying
> dependencies. Is the parent options a solution for hosts that depend on a
> lot of routers/firewalls? Something like that?
>
> monitoring client -> rt1 -> fw1 -> rt -> fw2 -> rt2 -> client
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: florian.beese at infoconsult.nu
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:14:05 +0100
> Subject: [Nagios-users] $HOSTADDRESS$ in notes_url in hostextinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem using the macro $HOSTADDRESS$ in the hostextinfo
> configuration with Nagios 1.2 (on SuSE Linux 9.1).
>
> I wanted to use the $HOSTADDRESS$ macro as a part of the notes_url, in order
> to connect to the monitored machine via VNC. My Problem now is, that the
> macro does not contain the IP address as expected, but the IP-Address
> devided with %2e instead of normal dods.
>
> When I put the mouse over the link the information in the status bar of the
> browser looks right, but when I follow the link (click) the address in the
> address-bar of the new opened window contains "%2e"s instead of normal dods.
> This ofcourse can also be seen in the generated HTML-Code of the status.cgi.
>
> My configuration of hostextinfo looks like the following:
>
> define hostextinfo{
> host_name prince
> notes_url http://192.168.10.18:5800
> icon_image windows_pc.gif
> icon_image_alt Silke's Rechner
> vrml_image windows_pc.gif
> statusmap_image windows_pc.gd2
> 2d_coords 140,90
> 3d_coords 180.0,90.0,40.0
> }
>
> define hostextinfo{
> host_name mogli
> notes_url http://$HOSTADDRESS$:5800
> icon_image ids_server.gif
> icon_image_alt Arbeitsplatz und Nagiostestrechner
> vrml_image ids_server.gif
> statusmap_image ids_server.gd2
> 2d_coords 80,90
> 3d_coords 100.0,40.0,20.0
> }
>
> The upper one works well, because its hard coded (doesn't contain the
> macro). The lower one instead has the effect described above.
>
> upper hostextinfo link: http://192.168.10.18:5800/
> lower hostextinfo link: http://192%2e168%2e10%2e12:5800/
>
> I searched the documentation and mailinglist archieves for info about this
> issue, but did not find any. So I don't know, if this is a bug or not.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> regards
> Florian Beese
>
>
> ____________
> Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> Version: AVK 15.0.1385 from 06.12.2004
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:49:03 +0100
> From: Andreas Ericsson <ae at op5.se>
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] $HOSTADDRESS$ in notes_url in hostextinfo
>
> florian.beese at infoconsult.nu wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have a problem using the macro $HOSTADDRESS$ in the hostextinfo
>>configuration with Nagios 1.2 (on SuSE Linux 9.1).
>>
>>I wanted to use the $HOSTADDRESS$ macro as a part of the notes_url, in
>>order to connect to the monitored machine via VNC. My Problem now is,
>>that the macro does not contain the IP address as expected, but the
>>IP-Address devided with %2e instead of normal dods.
>>
>
>
> This has been fixed in Nagios 2 CVS.
>
>
>>When I put the mouse over the link the information in the status bar
>>of the browser looks right, but when I follow the link (click) the
>>address in the address-bar of the new opened window contains "%2e"s
>>instead of normal dods. This ofcourse can also be seen in the
>>generated HTML-Code of the status.cgi.
>>
>>My configuration of hostextinfo looks like the following:
>>
>>define hostextinfo{
>> host_name prince
>> notes_url http://192.168.10.18:5800
>> icon_image windows_pc.gif
>> icon_image_alt Silke's Rechner
>> vrml_image windows_pc.gif
>> statusmap_image windows_pc.gd2
>> 2d_coords 140,90
>> 3d_coords 180.0,90.0,40.0
>>}
>>
>>define hostextinfo{
>> host_name mogli
>> notes_url http://$HOSTADDRESS$:5800
>> icon_image ids_server.gif
>> icon_image_alt Arbeitsplatz und Nagiostestrechner
>> vrml_image ids_server.gif
>> statusmap_image ids_server.gd2
>> 2d_coords 80,90
>> 3d_coords 100.0,40.0,20.0
>>}
>>
>>The upper one works well, because its hard coded (doesn't contain the
>>macro). The lower one instead has the effect described above.
>>
>>upper hostextinfo link: http://192.168.10.18:5800/
>>lower hostextinfo link: http://192%2e168%2e10%2e12:5800/
>>
>>I searched the documentation and mailinglist archieves for info about
>>this issue, but did not find any. So I don't know, if this is a bug or
>>not.
>>
>>Thanks in advance!
>>
>>regards
>> Florian Beese
>>
>>
>>____________
>>Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
>>Version: AVK 15.0.1385 from 06.12.2004
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real
>>users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
>>reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
>>_______________________________________________
>>Nagios-users mailing list
>>Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
>>reporting any issue.
>>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>>
>
>
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Lead Developer
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list