Status oscillates w/check_by_ssh.
Sand Philipp
Philipp.Sand at sycor.de
Wed Dec 29 08:31:51 CET 2004
I had the same Problem here using Nagios 2.0a1 on a Fedora Core 2
Server.
Didn't solved the Problem though :-/
For me it worked, to move the check to a different server, with a newer
ssh Version...
BTW, just one nagios process running...
________________________________
From: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of
scott_yem at agilent.com
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:31 PM
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Re: Status oscillates
w/check_by_ssh.
I had this happening when I had multiple nagios processes
running. You should check that out.
Scott Yem
Research Computing Services
Agilent Laboratories
________________________________
From: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Scott Zak
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 1:27 PM
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Re: Status oscillates w/check_by_ssh.
After allowing the service checks to run for a while, I'm
finding that the service status is oscillating between OK and UNKNOWN.
So it's working sometimes, and sometimes it's not. Yikes.
It doesn't seem likely that this has anything to do with
timeouts or missed thresholds (I'm going to try increasing them anyway).
__________________
It's doing what it is supposed to do -- returning zero.
That is also the return when running check_by_ssh on the nagios
box.
Scott
----- Forwarded by Scott Zak/IST/CSUSO on 12/27/04 01:18 PM
-----
D Brian Hendrix <dhendrix2 at csc.com>
12/27/04 12:57 PM
To: "Scott Zak" <ZakS at sysoff.ctstateu.edu>
cc:
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Status Unknown
w/check_by_ssh. Command line OK.
Scott,
When you run the command on the Sun box, what is the error code
returned?
Use the following command:
> echo $?
You should get a zero (0) if successful, or a one (1) or higher
if not
successful.
(Embedded image moved to file: pic06900.gif)
Brian Hendrix
Senior System Administrator - DCI
IT/9KIDD, Baptist Hospital
2000 Church Street, Nashville, TN 37062
(615) 284-5297 work
(615) 222-1704 fax
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Whatever you do, do your work heartily,
as for the Lord rather than for men
- Colossians 3:23
~~~ ><> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Scott Zak"
<ZakS at sysoff.ctst
ateu.edu>
To
Sent by:
nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
nagios-users-admi
cc
n at lists.sourcefor
ge.net
Subject
[Nagios-users] Status
Unknown
w/check_by_ssh. Command
line OK.
12/27/2004 11:52
AM
Hi ,
I'm setting up check_by_ssh to invoke a script via forced
command on a
remote server to check a service status. The script returns the
correct
status on the server where it lives, and when I run check_by_ssh
on the
command-line, all is well. Nagios runs the remote command (and
displays
the contents of stdout on the status detail page), but the
status always
comes back 'Unknown'.
Command-line:
[nagios at nagios1]$ libexec/check_by_ssh -H 149.152.10.183 -l
remoteuser -i
/path/to/rsa/identity_key -C 'LDAP'
LDAP daemon is running.
When nagios runs the service check, the same 'LDAP daemon is
running.'
message appears in the status information, but the status is
nevertheless
marked as hard 'UNKNOWN'.
Here's checkcommands.cfg:
define command{
command_name check-cp-ldap
command_line $USER1$/check_by_ssh -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -l
remoteuser
-i /path/to/rsa/identity_key -C 'LDAP'
}
This is the status log entry:
[1104169159]
SERVICE;soluminis1;LDAP;UNKNOWN;3/3;HARD;1104169025;1104169205;ACTIVE;
1;1;1;1104157840;0;UNKNOWN;3706;335959;419;530;1104165074;2;1;0;1;1;0;0.
00;0;1;1;1;LDAP
daemon is running.
Nagios is running on RH Linux, and the target host is Solaris 9.
Nagios'
SSH is OpenSSH and the Solaris box is running Sun_SSH_1.0,
protocol
versions 1.5/2.0. The remote script worked correctly when
monitoring
services on a Solaris 8 box which was running SSH Secure Shell
(non-commercial license). Check_by_ssh is from nagios-plugins
1.4.0alpha1,
version 1.18.
What am I not seeing? It's probably some bonehead maneuver on
my part, but
has anyone else run into (and found their way around) this?
Scott Zak
Connecticut State University System.
Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any
attachments,
contains
information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. The
information
is intended
only for the individual(s) named above. If you are not the
intended
recipient or the
person responsible for delivering the email to the intended
recipient, be
advised that
you have received this email in error and that any use,
dissemination,
distribution,
forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. If
you have received
this email in error, please purge it immediately and notify the
sender.
************************************************
sycor plastics - die neue Branchenlösung für die Kunststoffindustrie
www.sycor-plastics.de
************************************************
Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich und kann darüber hinaus persönliche Informationen beinhalten. Wenn Sie nicht der bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sind, löschen Sie bitte die E-Mail und deren Anhänge sofort und benachrichtigen Sie uns darüber. Die Firma sycor willigt in keine Verträge oder vertragliche Verpflichtungen ein oder übermittelt rechtsverbindliche Angebote, die in Form von E-Mail versandt werden, sofern dies nicht ausdrücklich in schriftlicher Form zwischen den Parteien vereinbart wurde.
This e-mail is confidential and may contain personal and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this e-mail and all attachments immediately and inform us. The company sycor does not agree with contracts or contract obligations sent by e-mail, neither do we transmit legally binding offers by e-mail, unless this is not expressly agreed upon between the parties and documented in written form.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20041229/9d9d532e/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list