parents question again

[Quanah Gibson-Mount]

--On Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:12 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount 
<quanah at stanford.edu> wrote:

>
> I think we are talking about dependencies in different ways. ;)  If
> switch2 is wired through switch 1 with a cross-over cable, it is in many
> ways dependant on switch 1 for general functionality, which is the type
> of dependency I thought you were talking of in your diagram.  Yes, you
> get proper parent/child relationships in relation to Nagios, but you
> don't get overall network dependencies is my point.  Anyway, if you can
> specify what switch a given Nagios server is connected to, with
> everything else having its parents defined, then Nagios should be able to
> easily build the parent/child maps from its point of view, regardless of
> where it is attached into the network.

Actually, never mind, after a few seconds more thought I understand what 
you are saying about 1/2's relationships to each other.. Hm.. I'll have to 
think a little more on that. ;)

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null