Fedore Core 2? Stable to run nagios on?

[Mark Berkeland]

I installed Nagios 1.2 on FC2, about 2 weeks ago.  I am monitoring about
2 dozen devices, no problems so far!
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Adrian
Moir
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:32 AM
To: Rhugga
Cc: Nagios-Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Fedore Core 2? Stable to run nagios on?
 

Rhugga, 
        I have just installed Nagios & Nagmin on FC2 all seems to be
working so far. 

Adrian Moir
IT Project Analyst

Electronic Solutions
Minerva House
1-4 North Crescent
Chenies Street
London WC1E 7ER
Tel: +44 (0)207 631 2882
E-mail: adrian.moir at e-s.co.uk
www.e-s.co.uk 



 
Rhugga <nagios-user at sandiego420.com> 
Sent by: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net 
09/07/2004 15:38 
        
        To:        Nagios-Users List
<nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net> 
        cc:         
        Subject:        [Nagios-users] Fedore Core 2? Stable to run
nagios on?




I have been testing FC2 in our data center, mainly on our 2 Linux 
clusters, but I want to build a new network management system using 
nagios. Is nagios pretty stable on FC2 or should I stay with Red Hat 9? 
(or Solaris 9) I ask because FC2 seemed stable at first, from a 
workstation perspective, but once we moved it to some of our high-load 
systems we stated seeing various oddities and etc...

Thx,
CC




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null




**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20040709/837d4a7b/attachment.html>