Relation between Freshness Check period and service check period
Sumit Malhotra
smalhotra at dataarmor.net
Wed Jun 16 12:17:40 CEST 2004
Hi ,
Is there any relation between freshness check period and service check period ??
I have observed both work independently i.e. if the freshnesss check is 10 minutes and service check period is 16*5
The active check(check_command) will be executed out of the service check period(16*5) Am i missing something ???
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sumit
#####
define service {
name generic-service-passive ; The 'name' of this service template, referenced in other service definitions
active_checks_enabled 0 ; Active service checks are enabled
passive_checks_enabled 1 ; Passive service checks are enabled/accepted
parallelize_check 1 ; Active service checks should be parallelized (disabling this can lead to major performance problems)
obsess_over_service 1 ; We should obsess over this service (if necessary)
check_freshness 1 ; Default is to NOT check service 'freshness'
freshness_threshold 1800 ; default 15 minutes
check_command no-report
notifications_enabled 1 ; Service notifications are enabled
event_handler_enabled 1 ; Service event handler is enabled
flap_detection_enabled 1 ; Flap detection is enabled
process_perf_data 1 ; Process performance data
retain_status_information 1 ; Retain status information across program restarts
retain_nonstatus_information 1 ; Retain non-status information across program restarts
register 0 ; DONT REgISTER THIS DEFINITION - ITS NOT A REAL SERVICE, JUST A TEMPLATE!
}
define service {
use generic-service-passive ; Name of service template to use
host_name ABC
service_description report
is_volatile 0
check_period 24x7
max_check_attempts 3
normal_check_interval 5
retry_check_interval 1
contact_groups admins
notification_interval 120
notification_period 24x7
notification_options w,u,c,r
freshness_threshold 600
check_command no-report
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20040616/450eecd9/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list