reading load status
Bit Takeshi
vuhung16duong at yahoo.co.jp
Fri Feb 25 08:44:28 CET 2005
Hello all,
How we read "load average" in load Load Service? I got
noticed( see below) but don't know what "soft" and "hard"
mean. I just think "0.04, 0.39, 0.27" is not-that-bad
load.
Please give me some advices.
Thank you in advance.
#########################################
02-24-2005 03:07:50 Service Alert linux1 LOAD OK SOFT OK -
load average: 0.44, 0.58, 0.28
02-24-2005 03:07:00 Service Alert linux1 LOAD WARNING SOFT
WARNING - load average: 1.12, 0.71, 0.30
02-24-2005 03:05:50 Service Alert linux1 LOAD WARNING SOFT
WARNING - load average: 1.18, 0.62, 0.24
02-23-2005 03:10:50 Service Alert linux1 LOAD OK HARD OK -
load average: 0.04, 0.39, 0.27
02-23-2005 03:05:50 Service Alert linux1 LOAD WARNING HARD
WARNING - load average: 1.29, 0.67, 0.26
02-23-2005 03:04:50 Service Alert linux1 LOAD WARNING SOFT
WARNING - load average: 1.15, 0.52, 0.19
02-23-2005 03:03:50 Service Alert linux1 LOAD WARNING SOFT
WARNING - load average: 1.02, 0.36, 0.13
###########################
My system:
Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike)
Nagios 2.0b2
Mem: 1054822400 1037209600 17612800 0 179134464
700030976
Swap: 2089209856 108093440 1981116416
MemTotal: 1030100 kB
CPU: (Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz)x4.
http://www.fedu.uec.ac.jp/~vuhung/
http://chuiyang.org
__________________________________
Let's Celebrate Together!
Yahoo! JAPAN
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list