[Nagios-snmp-users] RE: ERROR: running table : Received noSuchName(2) error-status aterror-index 32.
Patrick Proy
nagios-user at proy.org
Thu Jun 30 09:54:41 CEST 2005
Hi,
host.hrSystem.hrSystemProcesses.0 gives the total number of processes on the
host without any filtering.
It would be like running my script with * as filter, which is not the aim of
the script.
Patrick
Nagios AT proy dot org
-----Message d'origine-----
De : nagios-snmp-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-snmp-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Jamie
Baddeley
Envoyé : mercredi 29 juin 2005 09:37
À : Patrick Proy
Cc : nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net;
nagios-snmp-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : [Nagios-snmp-users] RE: ERROR: running table : Received
noSuchName(2) error-status aterror-index 32.
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:08 +0200, Patrick Proy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a known issue of process check.
> The script does :
> 1) Get the snmp table with index and description
> 2) Match with the processes
> 3) Get the status of the selected processes
>
> I've done it like this because it takes a lot of time (and ressources
> on the remote host) to get the whole process table.
>
> Problem : if a process on the remote host die at step 2, then the
> index won't be valid and you will get an error at step 3....
>
> I've added a "-g" option wich gets the entire table at step 1 : it can
> help, but in case processes are dying/respawning very fast the problem
> will still be here.
Thanks for the prompt and detailed reply. I appreciate it. I'll try -g.
Have you considered using:
host.hrSystem.hrSystemProcesses.0 ?
This seems to report a process count, but I'm thinking you discounted this
for some reason, so am interested if that's the case - was it to do with
dealing with multiprocessors?
cheers
jamie
>
> Patrick
> nagios AT proy dot org
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Jamie Baddeley [mailto:jamie.baddeley at vpc.co.nz] Envoyé : mardi
> 28 juin 2005 21:58 À : Patrick Proy Cc :
> nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Objet : ERROR: running table : Received noSuchName(2) error-status
> aterror-index 32.
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I'm using your check_snmp_process.pl to do some process count checking
> on a variety of Linux hosts.
>
> >From time to time I get the error reponse shown above. In fact the
> error-index can change (32,46, 14,42,16 etc)
>
> I'm using the latest versions dl'ed from SF.
>
> These plugins are running on a RH EL3 system that has plenty of
> ram/processor.
>
> Admittedly I've only got one out of 10 hosts I'm monitoring
> complaining.
> The host in question is running net-snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.15 (Redhat) and
> 2.4-21 kernel.
>
> Have you seen similar compaints? Is there a workaround (that doesn't
> involve me upgrading the far end system)?
>
> Cheers
>
> jamie
>
>
>
--
Jamie Baddeley <jamie.baddeley at vpc.co.nz> ViewPoint Consulting Ltd
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=ick
_______________________________________________
Nagios-snmp-users mailing list
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list