SV: Nagios 2.0 stable

[jeff vier]

On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:39 +0100, Bergström Sebastian wrote:
> I realise that my question is unclear. I'm refering to the fact that 2.0 still is in beta. 
> We are running v.1.2 currently and are interested in the v.2.0.
> 
> I'm wondering if anyone has an idea of how much time it might take before 2.0 can go into a stable (non-beta) state.
> 
> Any idea?

To put it bluntly: Who Cares?

There are so many of us running it in production (I, myself, have been
doing so since "alpha"), isn't that good enough?

There will always be bugs, no matter what you call it (alpha, beta, pr,
rc, gold, etc).

In my, and I'm sure many others', experience, super-pre-double-alpha
code from a nice community-supported project like this is still going to
have less bugs than anything similar from Microsoft no matter how many
"final" versions they have.

And if something major does come up, there's usually a fix/work-around
in a few hours or days, not weeks or months.

So, just run it.  If you don't like it, I'll buy you a coke.

--boinger



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null