SV: Nagios 2.0 stable

[Nathan Oyler]

I think we get it.

In other words, Nagios is mostly stable because we all say it is. If you want to wait to use it, wait. 

I don't know why anyone cares. There's no real need to upgrade anyway unless it fixes some problem you have, which it did for me. Are we all really itchin to use service groups?

And I still have a problem I've yet to find out how to correct, that I did not have with Nagios 1.2. 

So whatever. The 1.4 plugin release was a bigger upgrade to me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-
> admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Jeff McCune
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:41 PM
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Re: SV: Nagios 2.0 stable
> 
>  >On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:39 +0100, Bergström Sebastian wrote:
>  >> I realise that my question is unclear. I"m refering to the fact that
>  >> 2.0 still is in beta. We are running v.1.2 currently and are
>  >> interested in the v.2.0. I"m wondering if anyone has an idea of how
>  >> much time it might take before 2.0 can go into a stable (non-beta)
>  >> state. Any idea?
>  >
>  > To put it bluntly: Who Cares?
> 
> I do.  I think it's possible I'm not the only one.
> 
>  > There are so many of us running it in production (I, myself, have been
>  > doing so since "alpha"), isn"t that good enough?
> 
> I'm curious how the release of bacula 2.0 relates to your choice to use
> alpha software in a production environment?
> 
>  > There will always be bugs, no matter what you call it (alpha, beta,
>  > pr, rc, gold, etc).
> 
> I'd like to quote http://dict.die.net/beta%20software/
> 
> beta software
>       n : pre-release software that has received an alpha test but
>           still has more bugs than a regular release; "beta
>           software is usually available only to particular users
>           who will test it"
> 
>  > In my, and I"m sure many others", experience, super-pre-double-alpha
>  > code from a nice community-supported project like this is still going
>  > to have less bugs than anything similar from Microsoft no matter how
>  > many "final" versions they have.
> 
> How does estimating the release of version 2.0 will be released?
> 
> Have you considered the possibility that people have different
> experiences than you?  You don't think it's possible that there are
> people who prefer not to run beta software in production environments.
> 
>  > And if something major does come up, there"s usually a fix/work-around
>  > in a few hours or days, not weeks or months.
> 
> What about the problem of certain mailing list contributors missing the
> boat entirely in response to a perfectly reasonable question?  Could you
> please fix/work-around that problem in a few hours or days?
> 
>  > So, just run it. If you don"t like it, I"ll buy you a coke.
> 
> I have no comment about that remark...
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Jeff McCune
> OSU Department of Mathematics System Support
> (614) 292-4962
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key BAF3211A



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded DevCon 2005
Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications & content.  Register
by 3/29 & save $300 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idh83&alloc_id149&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null