Nagios Graph Show.cgi error

[Peter Koinange]

check the error of apache 
k

On Monday 14 November 2005 10:28, VINAY_SHARMA at advanex.co.jp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>                I setup the nagios graph today.when i try to access show.cgi
> on page i got below error.anyone has some idea??
>
>
>
> Server error!
>       The server encountered an internal error and was unable to complete
>       your request.
>       Error message:
>       Premature end of script headers: show.cgi
>       If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & regards
> **************************************
> Vinay Sharma
> Information Systems and Solutions-Associates
> Advanex Inc (www.advanex.co.jp)
> Fon   : 813-3822-5863
> Fax         : 813-5815-7881
> Email       : vinay_sharma at advanex.co.jp
>
>
>
>                       Cam
>                       <cameron.matheson at gmail.com>         宛先:    
> nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net 送信者:                              cc:
>                       nagios-users-admin at lists.sour        件名:    
> [Nagios-users] difference between nrpe-nt and nsclient? ceforge.net
>
>
>                       2005/11/14 16:24
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to monitor some windows boxen (primarily win 2003 i think), for
> the standard stuff (disk space, cpu, blah), and more importantly to
> make sure a certain process is running at all times (it's not a
> service, just a process).  I have no problem doing this sort of thing
> on *nix, but i'm not quite so familiar w/ the wild world of windows.
> I did a quick google search and came across two different beasts that
> both look like they could do the job quite well: nsclient, and
> nrpe_nt.  Now the question is... what are the differences between the
> two?  I understand that nrpe_nt is mostly just a port of the standard
> nrpe (which i have read about, but have not yet had the occasion to
> use), whereas nsclient appears to be written from the ground up (and
> apparently more dated?).  I was just wondering if people w/ experience
> could tell me what (or hasn't) worked for them, and whether or not one
> of these is the more "standard" approach.
>
> thanks,
> Cameron Matheson
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
> Download
> it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
> Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
>
> reporting any issue.
>
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
> Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
> own Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> ::: reporting any issue. Messages without supporting info will risk being
> ::: sent to /dev/null


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null