nrpe + solaris problems

[Tom Healy]

Nope, they match.


On Feb 23, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Toto Capuccino wrote:

> my 2 cents: check that the IP of the host in hosts.cfg is the good  
> one.
>
> 2006/2/23, Tom Healy <thealy at nortom.com>:
> I can't seem to get nrpe to work correctly, the web interface reports
> connection refused, but if I run it via the command line it gets
> results.  Example below:
>
>
> On remote solaris 9 box:
> # ./nrpe -n -c nrpe.cfg   -d
>
> # ps -ef|grep nrp
>    nagios  1125     1  0 11:51:51 ?        0:00 ./nrpe -n -c  
> nrpe.cfg -d
>
> # ./check_nrpe -n -H 127.0.0.1 -c check_users
> USERS OK - 26 users currently logged in |users=26;75;100;0
>
>
> On nagios server (solaris 9) as user nagios:
> -------------------------------
> # ./check_nrpe -n -H xxx.foobar.com -c check_users
> USERS OK - 26 users currently logged in |users=26;75;100;0
>
>
> On same nagios server, but the web interface:
> ---------------------------------------------
> check_users.process CRITICAL    02-23-2006 11:52:31      0d 0h 59m
> 1s   3/3     Connection refused by host
>
>
>
> Config entry for this host:
> ---------------------------
>
> define service{
>          host_name               xxx.foobar.com
>          service_description     check_users.process
>          check_command           check_nrpe!check_users
>          max_check_attempts    3
>          normal_check_interval 5
>          retry_check_interval  1
>          check_period          24x7
>          notification_interval 5
>          notification_period   24x7
>          notification_options  c,r
>          contact_groups        healy
> }
>
>
> Check commands entry for the server:
> -------------------------------------
> # Check NRPE Daemon
> define command{
>          command_name    check_nrpe
>          command_line    /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_nrpe -H
> $HOSTADDRESS$ -c $ARG1$
>          }
>
>
> nrpe 2.4 compiled from source, both boxes solaris 9.  Running nagios
> Nagios 2.0b4 (upgrading soon).  Is this a bug in the 2.0b4 branch or
> am I just being dense & missing something obvious?
>
> -Tom
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20060223/882ef660/attachment.html>