Child host notify status problem
James Tran
james at nttmcl.com
Wed Mar 28 02:24:18 CEST 2007
Thomas Stocking wrote:
> Just for completeness sake, try this:
> stop nagios
> ps -ef |grep nagios
> If there are any nagios procs around after a minute or so, kill them.
> The ps should come back clean.
> Start nagios. See if it recurrs.
> I'm guessing that an old nagios process is hanging around and giving
> you these notifications. It has happened to me...
> Thomas
>
> James Tran wrote:
>> Thomas Stocking wrote:
>>> James,
>>> Nagios should be setting the dependent hosts to an unreachable
>>> status when the parent host is down. This is the logic that allows
>>> you to suppress notification for hosts being down "downstream" of a
>>> router that fails.
>>> The most common problem I have seen with this is that the host
>>> notify options are actually set to tell you when the host is
>>> Unreachable. Take the "U" out of the host notifiy options, and you
>>> should not see this happen any more.
>>> If, however, the hosts are set to status DOWN, then something else
>>> is going on. You may be overloading Nagios, or some other inhibitor
>>> is affecting it's ability to set the dependent hosts Unreachable.
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> James Tran wrote:
>>>> Hi i have some parent/child settings on my hosts
>>>>
>>>> All of my servers are set to be child hosts to 1 ROUTER. I had
>>>> tried to test my notifications by unplugging the ethernet interface
>>>> on the server running nagios to see if i get a million host
>>>> notifications and of course i still do.
>>>>
>>>> I wanted it to setup to check if the router is down first before
>>>> sending any notifications from the children hosts. For some reason
>>>> though the child hosts keep sending both service and host
>>>> notifications through even though it knows the router is down. So
>>>> every time it knows the router is down it still sending about 50
>>>> emails to me saying all my hosts are down.
>>>>
>>>> I even tried to double it up by setting host dependencies up by
>>>> setting all hosts dependent to the router but they still send
>>>> notifications.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any little setting in here i'm forgetting?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>>>> share your
>>>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nagios-users mailing list
>>>> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>>>> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
>>>> reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk
>>>> being sent to /dev/null
>>>>
>> Yeah i double checked to see if the unreachable status was taken off
>> but it wasn't. So i removed them from all hosts and for some crazy
>> reason... still getting host down messages. this is driving me nuts.
>> What are the default permission and owners on the nagios files? maybe
>> i have them different cause i'm running a frontend called oreon.
You're a genius. Thank you. Killing the old nagios and starting a new
one fresh did the job. I guess just restarting it wouldn't do i had to
do a kill -9 to bring it down.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list